Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38401044›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of pediatrics : WJP2024

Improving the second-tier classification of methylmalonic acidemia patients using a machine learning ensemble method.

Zhi-Xing Zhu, Georgi Z Genchev, Yan-Min Wang, Wei Ji, Yong-Yong Ren, Guo-Li Tian, Sira Sriswasdi, Hui Lu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of pediatrics : WJP, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhi-Xing Zhu *Shanghai Engineering Research Center for Big Data in Pediatric Precision Medicine, Center for Biomedical Informatics, Shanghai Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Georgi Z Genchev *Center of Excellence in Computational Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Yan-Min WangNewborn Screening Center, Shanghai Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Wei JiNewborn Screening Center, Shanghai Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yong-Yong RenSJTU-Yale Joint Center for Biostatistics and Data Science, National Center for Translational Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Guo-Li TianNewborn Screening Center, Shanghai Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China. tiangl@shchildren.com.cn.
Sira SriswasdiCenter of Excellence in Computational Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. sira.sr@chula.ac.th.
Hui LuShanghai Engineering Research Center for Big Data in Pediatric Precision Medicine, Center for Biomedical Informatics, Shanghai Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China. huilu@sjtu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-8347-0830
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNChulalongkorn University · TH

Funding

Chulalongkorn University Second Century Fund (C2F)Clinical Research Plan of SHDC SHDC2020CR1047BClinical Research Plan of SHDC SHDC2020CR6028National Key R&D Program of China 2022YFC2703103Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai 22Y11906900
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMethylmalonic acidemia (MMA) is a disorder of autosomal recessive inheritance, with an estimated prevalence of 1:50,000. First-tier clinical diagnostic tests often return many false positives [five false positive (FP): one true positive (TP)]. In this work, our goal was to refine a classification model that can minimize the number of false positives, currently an unmet need in the upstream diagnostics of MMA.

methodsWe developed machine learning multivariable screening models for MMA with utility as a secondary-tier tool for false positives reduction. We utilized mass spectrometry-based features consisting of 11 amino acids and 31 carnitines derived from dried blood samples of neonatal patients, followed by additional ratio feature construction. Feature selection strategies (selection by filter, recursive feature elimination, and learned vector quantization) were used to determine the input set for evaluating the performance of 14 classification models to identify a candidate model set for an ensemble model development.

resultsOur work identified computational models that explore metabolic analytes to reduce the number of false positives without compromising sensitivity. The best results [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 97%, sensitivity of 92%, and specificity of 95%] were obtained utilizing an ensemble of the algorithms random forest, C5.0, sparse linear discriminant analysis, and autoencoder deep neural network stacked with the algorithm stochastic gradient boosting as the supervisor. The model achieved a good performance trade-off for a screening application with 6% false-positive rate (FPR) at 95% sensitivity, 35% FPR at 99% sensitivity, and 39% FPR at 100% sensitivity.

conclusionsThe classification results and approach of this research can be utilized by clinicians globally, to improve the overall discovery of MMA in pediatric patients. The improved method, when adjusted to 100% precision, can be used to further inform the diagnostic process journey of MMA and help reduce the burden for patients and their families.

Indexed as

Amino Acid Metabolism, Inborn ErrorsMachine LearningFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaleNeonatal ScreeningSensitivity and SpecificityMachine learningMethylmalonic acidemiaSecond-tier testStacking

Identifiers

PMID38401044
PMCPMC11502559
OpenAlexW4392135715

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.