ArticleNature communications2024
Single-molecule RNA sizing enables quantitative analysis of alternative transcription termination.
Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nanopore-Based Profiling of PEGylation in Nucleic Acid Therapeutics.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- Article
- Modular RNA:DNA Nanostructures Enable Nanopore Profiling of rRNA Processing and rRNA Variants.ACS nano · 2026Article
- Quantification of disease-associated RNA tandem repeats by nanopore sensing.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Scalable production of monovalent streptavidin with high yield and purity.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Supramolecular Interactions Modulate RNA:DNA Folding Observed via Nanopore Sensing.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025Article
- Programmable RNA Nanostructures Enable Nanopore Detection of Cotranscriptionally Introduced RNA Modifications.Nano letters · 2025Article
- High-throughput sequencing: a breakthrough in molecular diagnosis for precision medicine.Functional & integrative genomics · 2025Review
- mRNA Fragmentation Pattern Detected by SHAPE.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Article
- Single-mode termination of phage transcriptions, disclosing bacterial adaptation for facilitated reinitiations.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Nanopore Translocation Reveals Electrophoretic Force on Noncanonical RNA:DNA Double Helix.ACS nano · 2024Article
- Effective Synthesis of High-Integrity mRNA Using In Vitro Transcription.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcription, a critical process in molecular biology, has found many applications in RNA synthesis, including mRNA vaccines and RNA therapeutics. However, current RNA characterization technologies suffer from amplification and enzymatic biases that lead to loss of native information. Here, we introduce a strategy to quantitatively study both transcription and RNA polymerase behaviour by sizing RNA with RNA nanotechnology and nanopores. To begin, we utilize T7 RNA polymerase to transcribe linear DNA lacking termination sequences. Surprisingly, we discover alternative transcription termination in the origin of replication sequence. Next, we employ circular DNA without transcription terminators to perform rolling circle transcription. This allows us to gain valuable insights into the processivity and transcription behaviour of RNA polymerase at the single-molecule level. Our work demonstrates how RNA nanotechnology and nanopores may be used in tandem for the direct and quantitative analysis of RNA transcripts. This methodology provides a promising pathway for accurate RNA structural mapping by enabling the study of full-length RNA transcripts at the single-molecule level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.