Evidence mapPaperPMID 38402385Full record

SynthesisBMC cancer2024

Gut microbiota in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Haotian Huang, Yang Liu, Zhi Wen, Caixia Chen, Chongjian Wang, Hongyuan Li, Xuesong Yang

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Microbial dysbiosis and inferred functional profiling reveals the potential role ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Haotian HuangDepartment of Urology, Afliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Yang LiuDepartment of Urology, Afliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Zhi WenDepartment of Urology, Afliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Caixia ChenDepartment of Urology, Afliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Chongjian WangDepartment of Urology, Afliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Hongyuan LiDepartment of Urology, Afliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Xuesong YangDepartment of Urology, Afliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China. Xuesongyang2022@163.com.
North Sichuan Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreasing evidence indicates that gut microbiota are closely related to prostate cancer. This study aims to assess the gut microbiota composition in patients with prostate cancer compared to healthy participants, thereby advancing understanding of gut microbiota's role in prostate cancer.

methodsA systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The methodological quality of included studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), and pertinent data were analyzed. The kappa score assessed interrater agreement.

resultsThis study encompassed seven research papers, involving 250 prostate cancer patients and 192 controls. The kappa was 0.93. Meta-analysis results showed that alpha-diversity of gut microbiota in prostate cancer patients was significantly lower than in the control group. In terms of gut microbiota abundance, the ratio of Proteobacteria, Bacteroidia, Clostridia, Bacteroidales, Clostridiales, Prevotellaceae, Lachnospiraceae, Prevotella, Escherichia-Shigella, Faecalibacterium, and Bacteroides was higher in prostate cancer patients. Conversely, the abundance ratio of Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Selenomonadales, Veillonella, and Megasphaera was higher in the control group.

conclusionOur study reveals differences in alpha-diversity and abundance of gut microbiota between patients with prostate cancer and controls, indicating gut microbiota dysbiosis in those with prostate cancer. However, given the limited quality and quantity of selected studies, further research is necessary to validate these findings.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeProstatic NeoplasmsBacteriaDysbiosisHumansMale16S sequencingGut microbiotaMicrobiomeProstate cancerSystematic review and meta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID38402385
PMCPMC10893726
OpenAlexW4392137301

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.