ReviewGynecologic oncology2024
Potential of molecular classification to guide fertility-sparing management among young patients with endometrial cancer.
Review in Gynecologic oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cancer and fertility management: FIGO best practice advice.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025Guideline
- Review
- Current Treatment Options Guided by Molecular Classification in Endometrial Cancer.Current treatment options in oncology · 2026Review
- MRI-Based Radiomics Model for Predicting Eligibility for Conservative Management of Endometrial Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Assisted Reproductive Technology in Breast and Gynecologic Malignancies: Cancer Risk, Fertility Preservation, and Post-Treatment Reproductive Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Oncological and reproductive outcomes following fertility-preserving treatment in mismatch repair-deficient endometrial cancer or atypical endometrial hyperplasia.BMC women's health · 2026Article
- Molecular classification and immunotherapy in fertility-sparing treatment for endometrial cancer: opportunities and challenges.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Molecular classification of endometrial cancer in fertility-sparing-treatment: toward a personalized clinical approach.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Molecular Prognosticators Guiding Fertility-Sparing Surgery in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.Cancers · 2025Review
- Navigating the future of fertility preservation: advanced predictive strategies for treatment outcomes of endometrial atypical hyperplasia and carcinoma.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2025Review
- Challenges in Fertility Preservation for p53abn Grade 2 Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer: A Case Report and Literature Review.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2025Review
- Long-term outcomes of fertility-sparing treatment in endometrial carcinoma and endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia: Recurrence risk factors over a 9-year follow-up.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
- Impact of molecular and immune signature on endometrial biopsies with atypical hyperplasia with and without concurrent endometroid carcinoma.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2025Article
- Fertility-Sparing Treatments in Endometrial Cancer: A Comprehensive Review on Efficacy, Oncological Outcomes, and Reproductive Potential.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Analysis of the Clinicopathological Characteristics of Different Molecular Subtypes in Endometrial Cancer: A Retrospective Single Center Study.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
- Preclinical research models for endometrial cancer: development and selection of animal models.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Unsolved Issues in the Integrated Histo-Molecular Classification of Endometrial Carcinoma and Therapeutic Implications.Cancers · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The traditional histological classification system for endometrial carcinoma falls short in addressing the disease's molecular heterogeneity, prompting the need for alternative stratification methods. Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer (ProMisE) has emerged as a clinically efficient tool to categorize endometrial cancers according to mismatch repair deficiency, POLE exonuclease domain mutations, and p53 expression. However, the application of this classification to fertility-sparing treatments remains unexplored, and current guidelines lack specificity in how it should be used. In this review, we summarize the available literature and establish the framework for future investigations focused on molecular profiling-based risk assessment of endometrial cancer, with the goal of utilizing precision medicine to optimally counsel patients seeking fertility-sparing treatment. While the available evidence is limited and of low quality, it does provide insights and frames future perspectives for managing fertility-sparing approaches on the basis of molecular subtypes. Evidence suggests that mismatch repair-deficient tumors are likely to recur despite progestin therapy, emphasizing the need for alternative treatments, with targeted therapies being a new landscape that still needs to be explored. Tumors with POLE mutations exhibit a favorable prognosis, but the safety of hysteroscopic resection alone requires further investigation. p53 abnormal tumors have an unfavorable prognosis, raising questions about their suitability for fertility-sparing treatment. Lastly, the no specific molecular profile (or p53 wild-type) tumors, while having a relatively good prognosis, are heterogeneous and require more precise biomarkers to effectively guide therapy for those with poorer prognoses. Addressing these research gaps will lead to more precise guidelines to ensure optimal selection for fertility-sparing treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.