ArticlePatient preference and adherence2024
Preferences, Adherence, and Satisfaction: Three Years of Treatment Experiences of People with Multiple Sclerosis.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors influencing quality of life in multiple sclerosis patients in Northwest Ethiopia: a multicentre cross-sectional study.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Personality Traits and Their Association With Medication Non-Adherence in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
- Patient profiling in relapsing multiple sclerosis: insights from a real-world observational study into the unmet medical needs of patients on disease-modifying therapy.Journal of neurology · 2026Observational
- The effect of multiple sclerosis on functional status and sexual quality of life in female patients with multiple sclerosis.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of disease management across healthcare settings: the Multiple Sclerosis Center is a pillar for multi-disciplinary practices that promote quality of life for people with Multiple Sclerosis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- SMART-MC: Characterizing the Dynamics of Multiple Sclerosis Therapy Transitions Using a Covariate-Based Markov Model.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2026Article
- Evaluating use of disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis using claims data.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Treatment Adherence in MS: Does Objective MS Knowledge and MS Risk Knowledge Matter in Relation to Perceived Disease-Modifying Therapy Benefits?Neurology and therapy · 2025Article
- Insights from Patients and Physicians About Use of Evolocumab for LDL-C Management.Advances in therapy · 2025Article
- The use of high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis: recommendations from an expert Delphi consensus.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Article
- Clinical Practice Evidence of Treatment Satisfaction with Moderate and High-Efficacy Drugs in Multiple Sclerosis.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
- Article
- Patient and Physician Perspectives of Treatment Burden in Multiple Sclerosis.Neurology and therapy · 2024Article
- Decisional Conflict Regarding Disease-Modifying Treatment Choices Among Patients with Mid-Stage Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.Patient preference and adherence · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To reduce the risk of long-term disability in people with Multiple Sclerosis (pwMS), an increasing number of disease-modifying immune therapies (DMT) are available, involving diverse mechanisms of action, levels of efficacy, treatment risks, and tolerability aspects. Including patient preferences and expectations in shared decision-making may improve treatment satisfaction, adherence, and persistence. Purpose: To investigate long-term alignment of individual preferences and expectations of pwMS with their actual DMT and its effect on treatment satisfaction, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), adherence, and treatment discontinuation. Methods: A total of 401 pwMS beginning a new DMT were enrolled from 2015 to 2018 in a non-interventional study at three German MS centres. Patient preferences regarding DMT, TSQM-9, SF36, and self-reported adherence as well as relapses and EDSS were recorded at baseline and every 3 to 6 months for up to 3 years. Results: Efficacy and tolerability were the highest-ranking preferences at baseline. Actual selection of DMT corresponded more closely to safety than efficacy, tolerability, or convenience preferences. Participants reported excellent adherence throughout the study. DMT persistence was 69.0%, with earlier discontinuation for injectable vs oral or infusion therapies. Breakthrough disease, rather than patient-reported outcomes, was the main driver of DMT discontinuation. For all routes of administration, global treatment satisfaction increased over time despite lower satisfaction with convenience. Several patterns of changing preferences were observed. Conclusion: This study provides insight into the interaction of DMT preferences of pwMS with their actual treatment experience. Treatment decisions should be aligned with long-term expectations of pwMS to promote continuous adherence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.