Evidence mapPaperPMID 38409282Full record

Trial reportNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2024

Ghrelin decreases sensitivity to negative feedback and increases prediction-error related caudate activity in humans, a randomized controlled trial.

Michal Pietrzak, Adam Yngve, J Paul Hamilton, Anna Asratian, Emelie Gauffin, Andreas Löfberg, Sarah Gustavson, Emil Persson, Andrea J Capusan, Lorenzo Leggio and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Michal PietrzakCenter for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, 58183, Sweden.
Adam YngveCenter for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, 58183, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1012-7286
J Paul HamiltonCenter for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, 58183, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7982-4659
Anna AsratianCenter for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, 58183, Sweden.
Emelie GauffinCenter for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, 58183, Sweden.
Andreas LöfbergCenter for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, 58183, Sweden.
Sarah GustavsonCenter for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, 58183, Sweden.
Emil PerssonDivision of Economics, Department of Management and Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, 58183, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2994-0541
Andrea J CapusanCenter for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, 58183, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1758-2206
Lorenzo LeggioSection on Clinical Psychoneuroendocrinology and Neuropsychopharmacology, Translational Addiction Medicine Branch, National Institute on Drug Abuse Intramural Research Program and National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Division of Intramural Clinical and Biological Research, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7284-8754
Irene PeriniCenter for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, 58183, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5972-0913
Gustav TinghögDivision of Economics, Department of Management and Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, 58183, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8159-1249
Markus HeiligCenter for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, 58183, Sweden.
Rebecca BoehmeCenter for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, 58183, Sweden. Rebecca.bohme@liu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2803-3069
Linköping University · SENational Institute on Drug Abuse · US

Funding

Clinical Psychoneuroendocrinology and Neuropsychopharmacology (CPN)ZIADA000635 · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · 2025 to 2025
$2.7M
Marcus Wallenbergs Stiftelse för Internationellt Vetenskapligt Samarbete 2014.0187Vetenskapsrådet (Swedish Research Council) 2013-07434
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The stomach-derived hormone ghrelin plays not only a role in feeding, starvation, and survival, but it has been suggested to also be involved in the stress response, in neuropsychiatric conditions, and in alcohol and drug use disorders. Mechanisms related to reward processing might mediate ghrelin's broader effects on complex behaviors, as indicated by animal studies and mostly correlative human studies. Here, using a within-subject double-blind placebo-controlled design with intravenous ghrelin infusion in healthy volunteers (n = 30), we tested whether ghrelin alters sensitivity to reward and punishment in a reward learning task. Parameters were derived from a computational model of participants' task behavior. The reversal learning task with monetary rewards was performed during functional brain imaging to investigate ghrelin effects on brain signals related to reward prediction errors. Compared to placebo, ghrelin decreased punishment sensitivity (t = -2.448, p = 0.021), while reward sensitivity was unaltered (t = 0.8, p = 0.43). We furthermore found increased prediction-error related activity in the dorsal striatum during ghrelin administration (region of interest analysis: t-values ≥ 4.21, p-values ≤ 0.044). Our results support a role for ghrelin in reward processing that extends beyond food-related rewards. Reduced sensitivity to negative outcomes and increased processing of prediction errors may be beneficial for food foraging when hungry but could also relate to increased risk taking and impulsivity in the broader context of addictive behaviors.

Indexed as

Caudate NucleusGhrelinPunishmentRewardAdultDouble-Blind MethodFeedback, PsychologicalFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleReversal LearningYoung AdultGhrelin

Identifiers

PMID38409282
PMCPMC11039644
OpenAlexW4392159154

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.