Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38409377›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Tumor location matters, next generation sequencing mutation profiling of left-sided, rectal, and right-sided colorectal tumors in 552 patients.

Izabela Ciepiela, Magdalena Szczepaniak, Przemysław Ciepiela, Kinga Hińcza-Nowak, Janusz Kopczyński, Paweł Macek, Kamila Kubicka, Magdalena Chrapek, Magdalena Tyka, Stanisław Góźdź and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Detection ofOncology research · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Izabela CiepielaRadiotherapy Department, Holy Cross Cancer Centre, 25-734, Kielce, Poland.
Magdalena SzczepaniakDepartment of Molecular Diagnostics, Holy Cross Cancer Centre, 25-734, Kielce, Poland.
Przemysław CiepielaSurgical Oncology Department, Holy Cross Cancer Centre, 25-734, Kielce, Poland.
Kinga Hińcza-NowakDepartment of Molecular Diagnostics, Holy Cross Cancer Centre, 25-734, Kielce, Poland.
Janusz KopczyńskiSurgical Pathology, Holy Cross Cancer Centre, 25-734, Kielce, Poland.
Paweł MacekCollegium Medicum, Jan Kochanowski University, 25-319, Kielce, Poland.
Kamila KubickaDepartment of Molecular Diagnostics, Holy Cross Cancer Centre, 25-734, Kielce, Poland.
Magdalena ChrapekDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Jan Kochanowski University, 25-406, Kielce, Poland.
Magdalena TykaDepartment of Molecular Diagnostics, Holy Cross Cancer Centre, 25-734, Kielce, Poland.
Stanisław GóźdźCollegium Medicum, Jan Kochanowski University, 25-319, Kielce, Poland.
Artur KowalikDepartment of Molecular Diagnostics, Holy Cross Cancer Centre, 25-734, Kielce, Poland. Artur.Kowalik@onkol.kielce.pl.
Holy Cross University · PLJan Kochanowski University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the introduction of new molecular classifications, advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) is treated with chemotherapy supplemented with anti-EGFR and anti-VEGF targeted therapy. In this study, 552 CRC cases with different primary tumor locations (250 left side, 190 rectum, and 112 right side) were retrospectively analyzed by next generation sequencing for mutations in 50 genes. The most frequently mutated genes were TP53 in left-sided tumors compared to right-sided tumors and BRAF in right-sided tumors compared to left-sided tumors. Mutations in KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF were not detected in 45% of patients with left-sided tumors and in 28.6% of patients with right-sided tumors. Liver metastases were more common in patients with left-sided tumors. Tumors on the right side were larger at diagnosis and had a higher grade (G3) than tumors on the left. Rectal tumors exhibit distinctive biological characteristics when compared to left-sided tumors, including a higher absence rate of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations (47.4% in rectal versus 42.8% in left-sided tumors). These rectal tumors are also unique in their primary metastasis site, which is predominantly the lungs, and they have varying mutation rates, particularly in genes such as BRAF, FBXW7, and TP53, that distinguish them from tumors found in other locations. Primary tumor location has implications for the potential treatment of CRC with anti-EGFR therapy.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsRectal NeoplasmsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMutationProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)RectumRetrospective StudiesProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)

Identifiers

PMID38409377
PMCPMC10897470
OpenAlexW4392165728

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.