Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38410488›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024

Timing of Regadenoson-induced Peak Hyperemia and the Effects on Coronary Flow Reserve.

Nathan Kattapuram, Shahrad Shadman, Eric E Morgan, Charles Benton, Stacian Awojoodu, Dong-Yun Kim, Joao Ramos, Ana Barac, W Patricia Bandettini, Peter Kellman and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nathan KattapuramDivision of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Shahrad ShadmanDivision of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3282-2589
Eric E MorganDivision of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Charles BentonDivision of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Stacian AwojooduDivision of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Dong-Yun KimDivision of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Joao RamosDivision of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Ana BaracDivision of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
W Patricia BandettiniDivision of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Peter KellmanDivision of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Gaby WeissmanMedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Marcus CarlssonDivision of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
National Heart Lung and Blood Institute · USMedStar Washington Hospital Center · US

Funding

Technical Development of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance ImagingZIAHL006259 · NHLBI · NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE · PI MORGAN, ERIC · 2021 to 2025
$10.8M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA HL006259
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Regadenoson is used to induce hyperemia in cardiac imaging, facilitating diagnosis of ischemia and assessment of coronary flow reserve (CFR). While the regadenoson package insert recommends administration of radionuclide tracer 10-20 seconds after injection, peak hyperemia has been observed at approximately 100 seconds after injection in healthy volunteers undergoing cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). It is unclear when peak hyperemia occurs in a patient population. Objectives: The goal of this study was to determine time to peak hyperemia after regadenoson injection in healthy volunteers and patients, and whether the recommended image timing in the package insert underestimates CFR. Methods: Healthy volunteers (n=15) and patients (n=25) underwent stress CMR, including phase-contrast imaging of the coronary sinus at rest and multiple timepoints after 0.4 mg regadenoson injection. Coronary sinus flow (ml/min) was divided by resting values to yield CFR. Smoothed, time-resolved curves for CFR were generated with pointwise 95% confidence intervals. Results: CFR between 60 and 120 seconds was significantly higher than CFR at 30 seconds after regadenoson injection (p < 0.05) as shown by non-overlapping 95% confidence intervals for both healthy volunteers (30 s, [2.8, 3.4]; 60 s, [3.8, 4.4]; 90 s, [4.1, 4.7]; 120 s, [3.6, 4.3]) and patients (30 s, [2.1, 2.5]; 60 s, [2.6, 3.1]; 90 s, [2.7, 3.2]; 120 s, [2.5, 3.1]). Conclusion: Imaging at 90 seconds following regadenoson injection is the optimal approach to capture peak hyperemia. Imaging at 30 seconds, which is more aligned with the package insert recommendation, would yield an underestimate of CFR and confound assessment of microvascular dysfunction.

Indexed as

Coronary SinusHyperemiaPerfusion ImagingRegadenoson

Identifiers

PMID38410488
PMCPMC10896412
OpenAlexW4390906703

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.