Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38411709›Full record

ArticlePediatric cardiology2024

X-ray Doses in Relation to Body Mass, Indication, and Substrate During Pediatric Electrophysiological Procedures on the Heart.

Nikola Krmek, László Környei, Ivana Kralik, Diana Delić-Brkljačić, Milan Milošević, Mirta Rode, Flóra Kocsis, Vjekoslav Radeljić

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nikola KrmekUniversity of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia. knikola@yahoo.com.
László KörnyeiGottsegen National Cardiovascular Center, Hungarian Paediatric Heart Center, Budapest, Hungary.
Ivana KralikDubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia.
Diana Delić-BrkljačićUniversity of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.
Milan MiloševićUniversity of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.
Mirta RodeUniversity of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.
Flóra KocsisGottsegen National Cardiovascular Center, Hungarian Paediatric Heart Center, Budapest, Hungary.
Vjekoslav RadeljićUniversity of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.
University of Zagreb · HRGottsegen National Cardiovascular Center · HUUniversity Hospital Dubrava · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main goal of this study is to determine typical values of dose area product (DAP) and difference in the effective dose (ED) for pediatric electrophysiological procedures on the heart in relation to patient body mass. This paper also shows DAP and ED in relation to the indication, the arrhythmia substrate determined during the procedure, and in relation to the reason for using radiation. Organ doses are described as well. The subjects were children who have had an electrophysiological study done with a 3D mapping system and X-rays in two healthcare institutions. Children with congenital heart defects were excluded. There were 347 children included. Significant difference was noted between mass groups, while heavier children had higher values of DAP and ED. Median DAP in different mass groups was between 4.00 (IQR 1.00-14.00) to 26.33 (IQR 8.77-140.84) cGycm

Indexed as

Arrhythmias, CardiacRadiography, InterventionalChildFluoroscopyHumansRadiation DosageRadiographyX-RaysChildrenElectrophysiologyHeartRadiation doseTypical dosesX-rays

Identifiers

PMID38411709
OpenAlexW4392197336

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.