Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38412005›Full record

ArticleDiabetes care2024

Accuracy and Feasibility of Real-time Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients After Abdominal Surgery and Solid Organ Transplantation.

Barbora Voglová Hagerf, Marek Protus, Lenka Nemetova, Milos Mraz, Eva Kieslichova, Eva Uchytilova, Veronika Indrova, Jan Lelito, Peter Girman, Martin Haluzík and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring in critically ill patients.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
  8. Artificial pancreas: the past and the future.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2025
    Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Guided Insulin Infusion in Critically Ill Patients Promotes Safety, Improves Time Efficiency, and Enhances Provider Satisfaction.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2025
    Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Performance of point-of-care glucose testing for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes in South Africa.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Barbora Voglová HagerfDepartment of Diabetes, Diabetes Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-7132-5134
Marek ProtusFirst Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-6595-6877
Lenka NemetovaDepartment of Diabetes, Diabetes Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Milos MrazDepartment of Diabetes, Diabetes Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-5322-4612
Eva KieslichovaFirst Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-3930-623X
Eva UchytilovaFirst Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-0412-4137
Veronika IndrovaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Care, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jan LelitoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Care, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Peter GirmanDepartment of Diabetes, Diabetes Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-0944-8189
Martin HaluzíkDepartment of Diabetes, Diabetes Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-0201-6888
Janka FranekovaDepartment of Laboratory Methods, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-5094-7724
Veronika SvirlochovaDepartment of Laboratory Methods, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
David C KlonoffDiabetes Research Institute, Mills-Peninsula Medical Center, San Mateo, CA.ORCID 0000-0001-6394-6862
Michael A KohnUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.ORCID 0000-0001-5459-5044
Antonin JaborDepartment of Laboratory Methods, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-4144-3129
Charles University · CZInstitute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine · CZMills Peninsula Health Services · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Cooperatio Programme, section Medical Diagnostics and Basic Medical Sciences, Charles University, Prague, Czech RepublicNational Institute for Research of Metabolic and Cardiovascular Diseases (Programme EXCELES, ID Project No. LX22NPO5104) - Funded by the European Union - Next Generation EU) MH CZ - DRO (Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine - IKEM, IN 00023001)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveGlycemia management in critical care is posing a challenge in frequent measuring and adequate insulin dose adjustment. In recent years, continuous glucose measurement has gained accuracy and reliability in outpatient and inpatient settings. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and accuracy of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in ICU patients after major abdominal surgery. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsWe included patients undergoing pancreatic surgery and solid organ transplantation (liver, pancreas, islets of Langerhans, kidney) requiring an ICU stay after surgery. We used a Dexcom G6 sensor, placed in the infraclavicular region, for real-time CGM. Arterial blood glucose measured by the amperometric principle (ABL 800; Radiometer, Copenhagen, Denmark) served as a reference value and for calibration. Blood glucose was also routinely monitored by a StatStrip bedside glucose meter. Sensor accuracy was assessed by mean absolute relative difference (MARD), bias, modified Bland-Altman plot, and surveillance error grid for paired samples of glucose values from CGM and acid-base analyzer (ABL).

resultsWe analyzed data from 61 patients and obtained 1,546 paired glucose values from CGM and ABL. Active sensor use was 95.1%. MARD was 9.4%, relative bias was 1.4%, and 92.8% of values fell in zone A, 6.1% fell in zone B, and 1.2% fell in zone C of the surveillance error grid. Median time in range was 78%, with minimum (<1%) time spent in hypoglycemia. StatStrip glucose meter MARD compared with ABL was 5.8%.

conclusionsOur study shows clinically applicable accuracy and reliability of Dexcom G6 CGM in postoperative ICU patients and a feasible alternative sensor placement site.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseCritical IllnessAbdomenAdultAgedContinuous Glucose MonitoringFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, PhysiologicOrgan TransplantationBlood Glucose

Identifiers

PMID38412005
PMCPMC11116916
OpenAlexW4392184705

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.