Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38412830›Full record

ReviewCell reports methods2024

Experimental and data analysis advances in thermal proteome profiling.

Amanda M Figueroa-Navedo, Alexander R Ivanov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell reports methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of pentadecanoic acid.World journal of biological chemistry · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amanda M Figueroa-NavedoBarnett Institute of Chemical and Biological Analysis, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Alexander R IvanovBarnett Institute of Chemical and Biological Analysis, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Electronic address: a.ivanov@northeastern.edu.

Funding

Effect of methodological and biological variability on molecular profiling of extracellular vesicles in cancer detectionR01CA218500 · NCI · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI GHIRAN, IONITA CALIN, IVANOV, ALEXANDER R. · 2018 to 2022
$4.0M
Robust ultra-high sensitivity proteomic technologies for limited samplesR35GM136421 · NIGMS · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI Alexander R. Ivanov · 2020 to 2026
$3.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA218500NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM136421
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Method development for mass spectrometry (MS)-based thermal shift proteomic assays have advanced to probe small molecules with known and unknown protein-ligand interaction mechanisms and specificity, which is predominantly used in characterization of drug-protein interactions. In the discovery of target and off-target protein-ligand interactions, a thorough investigation of method development and their impact on the sensitivity and accuracy of protein-small molecule and protein-protein interactions is warranted. In this review, we discuss areas of improvement at each stage of thermal proteome profiling data analysis that includes processing of MS-based data, method development, and their effect on the overall quality of thermal proteome profiles. We also overview the optimization of experimental strategies and prioritization of an increased number of independent biological replicates over the number of evaluated temperatures.

Indexed as

ProteomeProteomicsData AnalysisLigandsMass SpectrometryLigandsProteomecellular thermal shift assaysCP: biotechnologydrug discoveryprotein-ligand interactionstarget engagementthermal proteomic profiling

Identifiers

PMID38412830
PMCPMC10921035

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.