Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38412831›Full record

ArticleCell reports methods2024

PXPermute reveals staining importance in multichannel imaging flow cytometry.

Sayedali Shetab Boushehri, Aleksandra Kornivetc, Domink J E Winter, Salome Kazeminia, Katharina Essig, Fabian Schmich, Carsten Marr

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sayedali Shetab BoushehriInstitute of AI for Health, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany; Institute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum MünchenMunich - Helmholtz Munich - German Research Center for Environmental Health, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany; Technical University of Munich, Department of Mathematics, 85748 Munich, Germany; Data & Analytics (D&A), Roche Pharma Research and Early Development (pRED), Roche Innovation Center Munich, 82377 Penzberg, Germany.
Aleksandra KornivetcInstitute of AI for Health, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany; Institute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum MünchenMunich - Helmholtz Munich - German Research Center for Environmental Health, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany; University of Hamburg, Department of Informatics, 22527 Hamburg, Germany.
Domink J E WinterInstitute of AI for Health, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany; Institute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum MünchenMunich - Helmholtz Munich - German Research Center for Environmental Health, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany; Technical University of Munich, School of Life Sciences, 85354 Weihenstephan, Germany.
Salome KazeminiaInstitute of AI for Health, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany; Technical University of Munich, Department of Mathematics, 85748 Munich, Germany.
Katharina EssigLarge Molecule Research (LMR), Roche Pharma Research and Early Development (pRED), Roche Innovation Center Munich, 82377 Penzberg, Germany.
Fabian SchmichData & Analytics (D&A), Roche Pharma Research and Early Development (pRED), Roche Innovation Center Munich, 82377 Penzberg, Germany.
Carsten MarrInstitute of AI for Health, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany. Electronic address: carsten.marr@helmholtz-munich.de.
Helmholtz Zentrum München · DERoche Pharma AG (Germany) · DEUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imaging flow cytometry (IFC) allows rapid acquisition of numerous single-cell images per second, capturing information from multiple fluorescent channels. However, the traditional process of staining cells with fluorescently labeled conjugated antibodies for IFC analysis is time consuming, expensive, and potentially harmful to cell viability. To streamline experimental workflows and reduce costs, it is crucial to identify the most relevant channels for downstream analysis. In this study, we introduce PXPermute, a user-friendly and powerful method for assessing the significance of IFC channels, particularly for cell profiling. Our approach evaluates channel importance by permuting pixel values within each channel and analyzing the resulting impact on machine learning or deep learning models. Through rigorous evaluation of three multichannel IFC image datasets, we demonstrate PXPermute's potential in accurately identifying the most informative channels, aligning with established biological knowledge. PXPermute can assist biologists with systematic channel analysis, experimental design optimization, and biomarker identification.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ImagingMachine LearningFlow CytometryImage Processing, Computer-AssistedStaining and Labelingcell profilingchannel importancecomputer visionCP: ImagingCP: Systems biologydeep learningimage flow cytometryinterpretable artificial intelligencemachine learningstaining importance

Identifiers

PMID38412831
PMCPMC10921034
OpenAlexW4392170288

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.