ArticleScientific reports2024
Fully automated kidney image biomarker prediction in ultrasound scans using Fast-Unet+.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Frugal Learning Methods for Kidney Segmentation in Non-Contrast MRI.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- 3D Adversarial Segmentation of Kidney-Transplant Across Multiple MRI Sequences Using Probabilistic and Anatomical Priors.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Explainable deep learning for early diagnosis of chronic kidney disease from CT images in Bangladeshi patients.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Advanced kidney mass segmentation using VHUCS-Net with protuberance detection network.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Deep learning framework for automated frame selection in kidney ultrasound.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Deep learning in renal ultrasound: applications, challenges, and future outlook.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Leveraging advanced feature extraction for improved kidney biopsy segmentation.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Any kidney dimension and volume variation can be a remarkable indicator of kidney disorders. Precise kidney segmentation in standard planes plays an undeniable role in predicting kidney size and volume. On the other hand, ultrasound is the modality of choice in diagnostic procedures. This paper proposes a convolutional neural network with nested layers, namely Fast-Unet++, promoting the Fast and accurate Unet model. First, the model was trained and evaluated for segmenting sagittal and axial images of the kidney. Then, the predicted masks were used to estimate the kidney image biomarkers, including its volume and dimensions (length, width, thickness, and parenchymal thickness). Finally, the proposed model was tested on a publicly available dataset with various shapes and compared with the related networks. Moreover, the network was evaluated using a set of patients who had undergone ultrasound and computed tomography. The dice metric, Jaccard coefficient, and mean absolute distance were used to evaluate the segmentation step. 0.97, 0.94, and 3.23 mm for the sagittal frame, and 0.95, 0.9, and 3.87 mm for the axial frame were achieved. The kidney dimensions and volume were evaluated using accuracy, the area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.