Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38414562›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Experiences of physiotherapists considering virtual reality for shoulder rehabilitation: A focus group study.

Beate Dejaco, Niamh Brady, Anne Tankink, Jeremy Lewis, Harry van Goor, J Bart Staal, Niki Stolwijk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Beate DejacoRadboud Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3221-5551
Niamh BradyDiscipline of Physiotherapy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Anne TankinkResearch Group Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jeremy LewisTherapy Department, Central London Community Healthcare National Health Service Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7870-9165
Harry van GoorRadboud Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J Bart StaalResearch Group Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Niki StolwijkResearch Group Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
HAN University of Applied Sciences · NLNational Health Service · GBRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity College Cork · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Shoulder pain is common and associated with substantial morbidity. Different treatment strategies are being prescribed with equivocal results. Virtual reality (VR) is a novel technology and emerging research suggests that VR may be a promising alternative to current treatments. Prior to effectiveness research or any large-scale introduction, VR-applications require appropriate scrutiny including feasibility- and acceptability of clinicians and patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to collect experiences of physiotherapists after using immersive VR. Methods: A qualitative interpretive design was used to explore physiotherapists' experiences related to the use of VR for people with shoulder symptoms. 17 physiotherapists were asked to use VR at home for five days prior to a focus group interview. Data from the focus group interviews were analyzed using a six-phase process of thematic analysis. Results: Three main themes were identified, each divided into subthemes. The main themes were: 1. VR as an extension of contemporary physiotherapy care: physiotherapists were positive about the potential of VR and its applicability in daily care. 2. Physiotherapist uncertainties of future care using VR: participants expressed concerns about their professional identity, particularly as patients engage in independent home exercises. 3. Physiotherapist's requirements for implementation of VR: participants shared their needs for evidence regarding the effectiveness and parameters such as frequency, dosage and intensity of the VR intervention. Conclusion: Physiotherapists were positive about VR as an intervention tool. However, they felt more knowledge is needed about parameters of VR. The findings of this study inform researchers and technology developers about optimal design of interventions and applications using VR.

Indexed as

physiotherapyqualitative interpretive designshoulder rehabilitationVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID38414562
PMCPMC10898295
OpenAlexW4392205431

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.