ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2024
Reducing the Risk of Fall among Oncology Patients using Failure Modes and Effects Analysis.
Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing referrals and utilization of the Healthy Lifestyle clinic: a pre-and post intervention study in primary health care.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Application of failure mode and effects analysis combined with bundled management measures in reducing ICU-acquired infections.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Innovation Culture in Oncology (IC-O) Scale: Psychometric Development and Validation Among Healthcare Professionals at a Comprehensive Cancer Center in Oman.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Article
- Using FMEA to Reduce the Risk of Delayed Reporting of Critical Radiological Results in Oncology: A Patient Safety Initiative.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Article
- Patient Education Strategies in Radiotherapy: A Narrative Review of Tools, Timing, and Therapist Roles.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2025Article
- Improving Turnaround Times and Operational Efficiency in Radiology Services: Quality Improvement Study in Oman.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Article
- Article
- Improving the Timely Reporting of Critical Radiological Results in Oncology to Enhance Patient Safety (A Quality Improvement Initiative at SQCCCRC).Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Article
- Enhancing Medication Safety: Reducing Administration Errors in Oncology Setting.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Article
- Optimizing Laboratory Processes: A Path to Reduced Sample Rejection in Oncology.Iranian journal of public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis project aimed to mitigate the risk of falls among oncology patients using Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) in the outpatient setting.<br /><br /><br /><br />Methods: The project was conducted within outpatient settings, specifically encompassing outpatient clinics, daycare, radiology and radiotherapy, and rehabilitation at the SQCCCRC. The project employed an observational analytical design to assess the fall risk assessment procedure in outpatient settings. The project integrated a 7-step procedure for conducting an FMEA methodology, including defining the system or process, identifying potential failure mode, evaluating the effects of each failure mode, Assigning severity, likelihood, and detection of occurrence ratings, and identifying and implement corrective actions. In addition, Risk Priority Numbers (RPNs) were used to identify the impact of the interventions in reducing the risk of patient fall assessment and management.<br /><br /><br /><br />Result: In the patient fall screening process, interventions yielded substantial reductions in RPNs for failure modes like "Wrong assessment" (57% decrease) and "Complex risk assessment scale" (63% decrease), addressing knowledge gaps and simplifying risk assessment. Similarly, the "Missed fall assessment" failure mode saw an impressive 80% reduction in RPN, rectifying unclear processes and knowledge gaps. In the Fall risk precaution measures process, interventions led to noteworthy RPN reductions, such as 80% for "Unclear fall precaution measures-responsibilities" and 57% for "Missed bracelets for high risk," demonstrating successful risk mitigation. Moreover, interventions in the Patient Education process achieved significant RPN reductions (57% and 55%) for "No/improper education" and "Unuse of educational material and resources," enhancing staff education and patient awareness. The total reduction in RPNs was 62% in all failure modes in the fall assessment and management process. <br /><br /><br /><br />Conclusion: Overall, FMEA is a valuable strategy for reducing fall risks among oncology patients, but its success depends on addressing these limitations and ensuring the thorough execution and maintenance of the identified corrective actions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.