Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38415557›Full record

ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2024

Reducing the Risk of Fall among Oncology Patients using Failure Modes and Effects Analysis.

Mohamad Majed, Omar Ayaad, Nabiha Said AlHasni, Rawan Ibrahim, Shinnona Hamed AlHarthy, Kefah Kaid Hassan, Razzan Al-Zadjali, Huda Al-Awaisi, Khalid Al-Baimani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Enhancing Medication Safety: Reducing Administration Errors in Oncology Setting.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mohamad MajedDepartment of Nursing, Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care and Research Centre (SQCCCRC), Muscat, Oman.
Omar AyaadQuality and Accreditation Department, Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care and Research Centre (SQCCCRC), Muscat, Oman.ORCID 0000-0003-1521-117X
Nabiha Said AlHasniDepartment of Nursing, Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care and Research Centre (SQCCCRC), Muscat, Oman.
Rawan IbrahimQuality and Accreditation Department, Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care and Research Centre (SQCCCRC), Muscat, Oman.
Shinnona Hamed AlHarthyAdmission, Discharge, and Transfer Office, Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care and Research Centre (SQCCCRC), Muscat, Oman.
Kefah Kaid HassanDepartment of Nursing, Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care and Research Centre (SQCCCRC), Muscat, Oman.
Razzan Al-ZadjaliQuality and Accreditation Department, Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care and Research Centre (SQCCCRC), Muscat, Oman.
Huda Al-AwaisiDepartment of Nursing, Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care and Research Centre (SQCCCRC), Muscat, Oman.
Khalid Al-BaimaniQuality and Accreditation Department, Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care and Research Centre (SQCCCRC), Muscat, Oman.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis project aimed to mitigate the risk of falls among oncology patients using Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) in the outpatient setting.<br /><br /><br /><br />Methods: The project was conducted within outpatient settings, specifically encompassing outpatient clinics, daycare, radiology and radiotherapy, and rehabilitation at the SQCCCRC. The project employed an observational analytical design to assess the fall risk assessment procedure in outpatient settings. The project integrated a 7-step procedure for conducting an FMEA methodology, including defining the system or process, identifying potential failure mode, evaluating the effects of each failure mode, Assigning severity, likelihood, and detection of occurrence ratings, and identifying and implement corrective actions. In addition, Risk Priority Numbers (RPNs) were used to identify the impact of the interventions in reducing the risk of patient fall assessment and management.<br /><br /><br /><br />Result: In the patient fall screening process, interventions yielded substantial reductions in RPNs for failure modes like "Wrong assessment" (57% decrease) and "Complex risk assessment scale" (63% decrease), addressing knowledge gaps and simplifying risk assessment. Similarly, the "Missed fall assessment" failure mode saw an impressive 80% reduction in RPN, rectifying unclear processes and knowledge gaps. In the Fall risk precaution measures process, interventions led to noteworthy RPN reductions, such as 80% for "Unclear fall precaution measures-responsibilities" and 57% for "Missed bracelets for high risk," demonstrating successful risk mitigation. Moreover, interventions in the Patient Education process achieved significant RPN reductions (57% and 55%) for "No/improper education" and "Unuse of educational material and resources," enhancing staff education and patient awareness. The total reduction in RPNs was 62% in all failure modes in the fall assessment and management process. <br /><br /><br /><br />Conclusion: Overall, FMEA is a valuable strategy for reducing fall risks among oncology patients, but its success depends on addressing these limitations and ensuring the thorough execution and maintenance of the identified corrective actions.

Indexed as

Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect AnalysisNeoplasmsAccidental FallsHumansProbabilityRisk AssessmentFailure Modes and Effects AnalysisOmanOncology PatientsSQCCCRCthe Risk of Fall,

Identifiers

PMID38415557
PMCPMC11077118

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.