Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38415656›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2024

APE-Gen2.0: Expanding Rapid Class I Peptide-Major Histocompatibility Complex Modeling to Post-Translational Modifications and Noncanonical Peptide Geometries.

Romanos Fasoulis, Mauricio M Rigo, Gregory Lizée, Dinler A Antunes, Lydia E Kavraki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. RankMHC: Learning to Rank Class-I Peptide-MHC Structural Models.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024
    Article
  9. Strengths and limitations of web servers for the modeling of TCRpMHC complexes.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Romanos FasoulisDepartment of Computer Science, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7106-6689
Mauricio M RigoDepartment of Computer Science, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, United States.
Gregory LizéeDepartment of Melanoma Medical Oncology─Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77054, United States.
Dinler A AntunesDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77004, United States.
Lydia E KavrakiDepartment of Computer Science, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0699-8038

Funding

PROTEAN-CR: Proteomics Toolkit for Ensemble Analysis in Cancer ResearchU01CA258512 · NCI · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI KAVRAKI, LYDIA E., LIZEE, GREGORY A · 2021 to 2023
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA258512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recognition of peptides bound to class I major histocompatibility complex (MHC-I) receptors by T-cell receptors (TCRs) is a determinant of triggering the adaptive immune response. While the exact molecular features that drive the TCR recognition are still unknown, studies have suggested that the geometry of the joint peptide-MHC (pMHC) structure plays an important role. As such, there is a definite need for methods and tools that accurately predict the structure of the peptide bound to the MHC-I receptor. In the past few years, many pMHC structural modeling tools have emerged that provide high-quality modeled structures in the general case. However, there are numerous instances of non-canonical cases in the immunopeptidome that the majority of pMHC modeling tools do not attend to, most notably, peptides that exhibit non-standard amino acids and post-translational modifications (PTMs) or peptides that assume non-canonical geometries in the MHC binding cleft. Such chemical and structural properties have been shown to be present in neoantigens; therefore, accurate structural modeling of these instances can be vital for cancer immunotherapy. To this end, we have developed APE-Gen2.0, a tool that improves upon its predecessor and other pMHC modeling tools, both in terms of modeling accuracy and the available modeling range of non-canonical peptide cases. Some of the improvements include (i) the ability to model peptides that have different types of PTMs such as phosphorylation, nitration, and citrullination; (ii) a new and improved anchor identification routine in order to identify and model peptides that exhibit a non-canonical anchor conformation; and (iii) a web server that provides a platform for easy and accessible pMHC modeling. We further show that structures predicted by APE-Gen2.0 can be used to assess the effects that PTMs have in binding affinity in a more accurate manner than just using solely the sequence of the peptide. APE-Gen2.0 is freely available at https://apegen.kavrakilab.org.

Indexed as

HominidaePeptidesAnimalsMajor Histocompatibility ComplexProtein BindingProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalReceptors, Antigen, T-CellPeptidesReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell

Identifiers

PMID38415656
PMCPMC10936522

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.