Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38416178›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular and interventional radiology2024

Radiomics-Based Prediction Model for Outcome of Radioembolization in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Wolfgang Roll, Max Masthoff, Michael Köhler, Kambiz Rahbar, Lars Stegger, David Ventura, Haluk Morgül, Jonel Trebicka, Michael Schäfers, Walter Heindel and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Japanese journal of radiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Predicting response and survival to first-line treatment with baseline [Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wolfgang RollDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Max MasthoffClinic for Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Michael KöhlerClinic for Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Kambiz RahbarDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Lars SteggerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
David VenturaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Haluk MorgülDepartment for General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Jonel TrebickaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Michael SchäfersDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Walter HeindelClinic for Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Moritz WildgruberClinic for Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Philipp SchindlerClinic for Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany. Philipp.Schindler@ukmuenster.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8098-9853
University Hospital Münster · DELMU Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the benefit of a contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) radiomics-based model for predicting response and survival in patients with colorectal liver metastases treated with transarterial Yttrium-90 radioembolization (TARE). MATERIALS AND

methodsFifty-one patients who underwent TARE were included in this single-center retrospective study. Response to treatment was assessed using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1) at 3-month follow-up. Patients were stratified as responders (complete/partial response and stable disease, n = 24) or non-responders (progressive disease, n = 27). Radiomic features (RF) were extracted from pre-TARE CT after segmentation of the liver tumor volume. A model was built based on a radiomic signature consisting of reliable RFs that allowed classification of response using multivariate logistic regression. Patients were assigned to high- or low-risk groups for disease progression after TARE according to a cutoff defined in the model. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to analyze survival between high- and low-risk groups.

resultsTwo independent RF [Energy, Maximal Correlation Coefficient (MCC)], reflecting tumor heterogeneity, discriminated well between responders and non-responders. In particular, patients with higher magnitude of voxel values in an image (Energy), and texture complexity (MCC), were more likely to fail TARE. For predicting treatment response, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the radiomics-based model was 0.75 (95% CI 0.48-1). The high-risk group had a shorter overall survival than the low-risk group (3.4 vs. 6.4 months, p < 0.001).

conclusionOur CT radiomics model may predict the response and survival outcome by quantifying tumor heterogeneity in patients treated with TARE for colorectal liver metastases.

Indexed as

Colonic NeoplasmsLiver NeoplasmsRectal NeoplasmsHumansRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesYttrium RadioisotopesYttrium RadioisotopesLiver metastasesRadioembolizationRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID38416178
OpenAlexW4392231808

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.