ArticleHeliyon2024
Molecular subtype identification and prognosis stratification based on lysosome-related genes in breast cancer.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning-based integration develops a novel lysosome-related prognostic signature associated with prognosis and immune infiltration landscape in acute myeloid leukemia.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- From "lysosomal addiction" to targeted therapies: exploiting novel windows in colorectal cancer.European journal of medical research · 2025Review
- Applying integrated transcriptome and single-cell sequencing analysis to develop a prognostic signature based on M2-like tumor-associated macrophages for breast cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- ZNRF2 is essential for gliomagenesis through orchestrating glycolysis and acts as a promising therapeutic target in glioma.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lysosomes are known to have a significant impact on the development and recurrence of breast cancer. However, the association between lysosome-related genes (LRGs) and breast cancer remains unclear. This study aims to explore the potential role of LRGs in predicting the prognosis and treatment response of breast cancer. Methods: Breast cancer gene expression profile data and clinical information were downloaded from TCGA and GEO databases, and prognosis-related LRGs were screened for consensus clustering analysis. Lasso Cox regression analysis was used to construct risk features derived from LRGs, and immune cell infiltration, immune therapy response, drug sensitivity, and clinical pathological feature differences were evaluated for different molecular subtypes and risk groups. A nomogram based on risk features derived from LRGs was constructed and evaluated. Results: Our study identified 176 differentially expressed LRGs that are associated with breast cancer prognosis. Based on these genes, we divided breast cancer into two molecular subtypes with significant prognostic differences. We also found significant differences in immune cell infiltration between these subtypes. Furthermore, we constructed a prognostic risk model consisting of 7 LRGs, which effectively divides breast cancer patients into high-risk and low-risk groups. Patients in the low-risk group have better prognostic characteristics, respond better to immunotherapy, and have lower sensitivity to chemotherapy drugs, indicating that the low-risk group is more likely to benefit from immunotherapy and chemotherapy. Additionally, the risk score based on LRGs is significantly correlated with immune cell infiltration, including CD8 T cells and macrophages. This risk score model, along with age, chemotherapy, clinical stage, and N stage, is an independent prognostic factor for breast cancer. Finally, the nomogram composed of these factors has excellent performance in predicting overall survival of breast cancer. Conclusions: In conclusion, this study has constructed a novel LRG-derived breast cancer risk feature, which performs well in prognostic prediction when combined with clinical pathological features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.