Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38420966›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine2024

Symptom content analysis of OSA questionnaires: time to identify and improve relevance of diversity of OSA symptoms?

Christophe Gauld, Sébastien Baillieul, Vincent P Martin, Alexandre Richaud, Régis Lopez, Marie Pelou, Poeiti Abi-Saab, Julien Coelho, Pierre Philip, Jean Louis Pépin and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Clinical significance criteria in the ICSD and DSM sleep disorder classifications: a content overlap analysis using the Jaccard index.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Christophe GauldService Psychopathologie du Développement de l'Enfant et de l'Adolescent, Hospices Civils de Lyon and Université de Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Sébastien BaillieulUniversity Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1300, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Service Universitaire de Pneumologie Physiologie, Grenoble, France.
Vincent P MartinUniversity Bordeaux, CNRS, Bordeaux INP, LaBRI, UMR 5800, Talence, France.
Alexandre RichaudUniversity Bordeaux, CNRS, SANPSY, UMR 6033, Bordeaux, France.
Régis LopezInstitut des Neurosciences de Montpellier (INM), University Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Marie PelouUniversity Bordeaux, CNRS, SANPSY, UMR 6033, Bordeaux, France.
Poeiti Abi-SaabUniversity Bordeaux, CNRS, SANPSY, UMR 6033, Bordeaux, France.
Julien CoelhoUniversity Bordeaux, CNRS, SANPSY, UMR 6033, Bordeaux, France.
Pierre PhilipUniversity Bordeaux, CNRS, SANPSY, UMR 6033, Bordeaux, France.
Jean Louis PépinUniversity Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1300, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Service Universitaire de Pneumologie Physiologie, Grenoble, France.
Jean-Arthur Micoulaud-FranchiUniversity Bordeaux, CNRS, SANPSY, UMR 6033, Bordeaux, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInserm · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectivesObstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a heterogeneous condition covering many clinical phenotypes in terms of the diversity of symptoms. Patient-based OSA screening questionnaires used in routine practice contain significantly varying contents that can impact the reliability and validity of the screening. We investigated to what extent common patient-based OSA screening questionnaires differ or overlap in their item content by conducting a rigorous, methodical, and quantified content overlap analysis.

methodsWe conducted an item content analysis of 11 OSA screening questionnaires validated in adult populations and characterized their overlap using a 4-step approach: (1) selection of OSA screening questionnaires, (2) item extraction and selection, (3) extraction of symptoms from items, and (4) assessment of content overlap with the Jaccard index (from 0, no overlap, to 1, full overlap).

resultsWe extracted 72 items that provided 25 distinct symptoms from 11 selected OSA questionnaires. The overlap between them was weak (mean Jaccard index: 0.224; ranging from 0.138 to 0.329). All questionnaires contained symptoms of the "OSA symptom" dimension (eg, snoring or witnessed apneas). The STOP-BANG (0.329) and the Berlin (0.280) questionnaires exhibited the highest overlap content. Ten symptoms (40%) were investigated in only 1 questionnaire.

conclusionsThe heterogeneity of content and the low overlap across these questionnaires reflect the challenges of screening OSA. The different OSA questionnaires potentially capture varying aspects of the disorder, with the risk of biased results in studies. Suggestions are made for better OSA screening and refinement of clinical OSA phenotypes. CITATION: Gauld C, Baillieul S, Martin VP, et al. Symptom content analysis of OSA questionnaires: time to identify and improve relevance of diversity of OSA symptoms?

Indexed as

Sleep Apnea, ObstructiveAdultFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesSymptom Assessmentcontent analysisobstructive sleep apneaquestionnairessleep disorderssleep symptomssymptom overlap

Identifiers

PMID38420966
PMCPMC11217627
OpenAlexW4392282860

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.