Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38424291›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2024

Dimensionality and optimal combination of autonomic fear-conditioning measures in humans.

Federico Mancinelli, Juliana K Sporrer, Vladislav Myrov, Filip Melinscak, Josua Zimmermann, Huaiyu Liu, Dominik R Bach

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Federico MancinelliUniversity of Bonn, Transdisciplinary Research Area "Life and Health", Hertz Chair for Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, Bonn, Germany. f.mancinelli@uni-bonn.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4606-5876
Juliana K SporrerWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9964-2876
Vladislav MyrovDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, and Psychosomatics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Filip MelinscakDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, and Psychosomatics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Josua ZimmermannDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, and Psychosomatics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Huaiyu LiuWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, London, UK.
Dominik R BachUniversity of Bonn, Transdisciplinary Research Area "Life and Health", Hertz Chair for Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, Bonn, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3717-2036

Funding

Austrian Science Fund ESP 133ERC Grant agreement No. ERC-2018 CoG-816564 ActionConWellcome TrustWellcome Trust 203147/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fear conditioning, also termed threat conditioning, is a commonly used learning model with clinical relevance. Quantification of threat conditioning in humans often relies on conditioned autonomic responses such as skin conductance responses (SCR), pupil size responses (PSR), heart period responses (HPR), or respiration amplitude responses (RAR), which are usually analyzed separately. Here, we investigate whether inter-individual variability in differential conditioned responses, averaged across acquisition, exhibits a multi-dimensional structure, and the extent to which their linear combination could enhance the precision of inference on whether threat conditioning has occurred. In a mega-analytic approach, we re-analyze nine data sets including 256 individuals, acquired by the group of the last author, using standard routines in the framework of psychophysiological modeling (PsPM). Our analysis revealed systematic differences in effect size between measures across datasets, but no evidence for a multidimensional structure across various combinations of measures. We derive the statistically optimal weights for combining the four measures and subsets thereof, and we provide out-of-sample performance metrics for these weights, accompanied by bias-corrected confidence intervals. We show that to achieve the same statistical power, combining measures allows for a relevant reduction in sample size, which in a common scenario amounts to roughly 24%. To summarize, we demonstrate a one-dimensional structure of threat conditioning measures, systematic differences in effect size between measures, and provide weights for their optimal linear combination in terms of maximal retrodictive validity.

Indexed as

Autonomic Nervous SystemConditioning, ClassicalFearGalvanic Skin ResponseHeart RateHumansMalePsychophysiologyPupilConditioned autonomic responsesFear conditioningInter-individual variabilityMega-analyticOptimal combinationPsychophysiological modelingThreat conditioning measures

Identifiers

PMID38424291
PMCPMC11335807

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.