Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38424645›Full record

ReviewJournal of intensive care2024

From bedside to recovery: exercise therapy for prevention of post-intensive care syndrome.

Keibun Liu, Oystein Tronstad, Dylan Flaws, Luke Churchill, Alice Y M Jones, Kensuke Nakamura, John F Fraser

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of intensive care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
12.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Exercise therapy for the treatment of delirium in the intensive care unit.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. [Challenge healthcare system: spotlight on PICS].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Long-Term Quality of Life Among Intensive Care Units Survivors.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Keibun Liu *Critical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, 627 Rode Road, Chermside, QLD, 4032, Australia. keiliu0406@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6867-1420
Oystein Tronstad *Critical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, 627 Rode Road, Chermside, QLD, 4032, Australia.
Dylan FlawsCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, 627 Rode Road, Chermside, QLD, 4032, Australia.
Luke ChurchillCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, 627 Rode Road, Chermside, QLD, 4032, Australia.
Alice Y M JonesSchool of Health & Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Kensuke NakamuraDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Yokohama City University Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
John F FraserCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, 627 Rode Road, Chermside, QLD, 4032, Australia.
The University of Queensland · AUQueensland University of Technology · AUYokohama City University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs advancements in critical care medicine continue to improve Intensive Care Unit (ICU) survival rates, clinical and research attention is urgently shifting toward improving the quality of survival. Post-Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) is a complex constellation of physical, cognitive, and mental dysfunctions that severely impact patients' lives after hospital discharge. This review provides a comprehensive and multi-dimensional summary of the current evidence and practice of exercise therapy (ET) during and after an ICU admission to prevent and manage the various domains of PICS. The review aims to elucidate the evidence of the mechanisms and effects of ET in ICU rehabilitation and highlight that suboptimal clinical and functional outcomes of ICU patients is a growing public health concern that needs to be urgently addressed. MAIN BODY: This review commences with a brief overview of the current relationship between PICS and ET, describing the latest research on this topic. It subsequently summarises the use of ET in ICU, hospital wards, and post-hospital discharge, illuminating the problematic transition between these settings. The following chapters focus on the effects of ET on physical, cognitive, and mental function, detailing the multi-faceted biological and pathophysiological mechanisms of dysfunctions and the benefits of ET in all three domains. This is followed by a chapter focusing on co-interventions and how to maximise and enhance the effect of ET, outlining practical strategies for how to optimise the effectiveness of ET. The review next describes several emerging technologies that have been introduced/suggested to augment and support the provision of ET during and after ICU admission. Lastly, the review discusses future research directions.

conclusionPICS is a growing global healthcare concern. This review aims to guide clinicians, researchers, policymakers, and healthcare providers in utilising ET as a therapeutic and preventive measure for patients during and after an ICU admission to address this problem. An improved understanding of the effectiveness of ET and the clinical and research gaps that needs to be urgently addressed will greatly assist clinicians in their efforts to rehabilitate ICU survivors, improving patients' quality of survival and helping them return to their normal lives after hospital discharge.

Indexed as

Exercise therapyIntensive care unitPost-intensive care syndromeRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID38424645
PMCPMC10902959
OpenAlexW4392298435

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.