Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38427281›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology2024

Applications of artificial intelligence in biliary tract cancers.

Pankaj Gupta, Soumen Basu, Chetan Arora

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pankaj GuptaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India. Pankajgupta959@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3914-3757
Soumen BasuDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology - Delhi, New Delhi, 110 016, India.
Chetan AroraDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology - Delhi, New Delhi, 110 016, India.
Indian Institute of Technology Delhi · INPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biliary tract cancers are malignant neoplasms arising from bile duct epithelial cells. They include cholangiocarcinomas and gallbladder cancer. Gallbladder cancer has a marked geographical preference and is one of the most common cancers in women in northern India. Biliary tract cancers are usually diagnosed at an advanced, unresectable stage. Hence, the prognosis is extremely dismal. The five-year survival rate in advanced gallbladder cancer is < 5%. Hence, early detection and radical surgery are critical to improving biliary tract cancer prognoses. Radiological imaging plays an essential role in diagnosing and managing biliary tract cancers. However, the diagnosis is challenging because the biliary tract is affected by many diseases that may have radiological appearances similar to cancer. Artificial intelligence (AI) can improve radiologists' performance in various tasks. Deep learning (DL)-based approaches are increasingly incorporated into medical imaging to improve diagnostic performance. This paper reviews the AI-based strategies in biliary tract cancers to improve the diagnosis and prognosis.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBiliary Tract NeoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaDeep LearningFemaleGallbladder NeoplasmsHumansPrognosisArtificial intelligenceBile ductBiliary tract cancerCancerDeep learningEndoscopyGallbladderGallbladder cancerImagingMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID38427281
OpenAlexW4392385622

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.