Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38427688›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2024

Meiotic prophase length modulates Tel1-dependent DNA double-strand break interference.

Luz María López Ruiz, Dominic Johnson, William H Gittens, George G B Brown, Rachal M Allison, Matthew J Neale

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Luz María López RuizGenome Damage and Stability Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0003-4101-3633
Dominic JohnsonGenome Damage and Stability Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7464-0893
William H GittensGenome Damage and Stability Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
George G B BrownGenome Damage and Stability Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5689-5363
Rachal M AllisonGenome Damage and Stability Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1074-4022
Matthew J NealeGenome Damage and Stability Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6453-1877
University of Sussex · GB

Funding

MOLECULAR DETERMINANTS FOR THE ACTION OF HALLUCINOGENSK05DA000060 · NIDA · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI WEINSTEIN, HAREL · 1990 to 2006
$742k
NIDA NIH HHS K05 DA000060Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During meiosis, genetic recombination is initiated by the formation of many DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) catalysed by the evolutionarily conserved topoisomerase-like enzyme, Spo11, in preferred genomic sites known as hotspots. DSB formation activates the Tel1/ATM DNA damage responsive (DDR) kinase, locally inhibiting Spo11 activity in adjacent hotspots via a process known as DSB interference. Intriguingly, in S. cerevisiae, over short genomic distances (<15 kb), Spo11 activity displays characteristics of concerted activity or clustering, wherein the frequency of DSB formation in adjacent hotspots is greater than expected by chance. We have proposed that clustering is caused by a limited number of sub-chromosomal domains becoming primed for DSB formation. Here, we provide evidence that DSB clustering is abolished when meiotic prophase timing is extended via deletion of the NDT80 transcription factor. We propose that extension of meiotic prophase enables most cells, and therefore most chromosomal domains within them, to reach an equilibrium state of similar Spo11-DSB potential, reducing the impact that priming has on estimates of coincident DSB formation. Consistent with this view, when Tel1 is absent but Ndt80 is present and thus cells are able to rapidly exit meiotic prophase, genome-wide maps of Spo11-DSB formation are skewed towards pericentromeric regions and regions that load pro-DSB factors early-revealing regions of preferential priming-but this effect is abolished when NDT80 is deleted. Our work highlights how the stochastic nature of Spo11-DSB formation in individual cells within the limited temporal window of meiotic prophase can cause localised DSB clustering-a phenomenon that is exacerbated in tel1Δ cells due to the dual roles that Tel1 has in DSB interference and meiotic prophase checkpoint control.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsDNADNA-Binding ProteinsEndodeoxyribonucleasesIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMeiosisProphaseProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeDNADNA-Binding ProteinsEndodeoxyribonucleasesIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTEL1 protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID38427688
PMCPMC10936813
OpenAlexW4392388726

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.