Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38427699›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2024

Computational models of compound nerve action potentials: Efficient filter-based methods to quantify effects of tissue conductivities, conduction distance, and nerve fiber parameters.

Edgar Peña, Nicole A Pelot, Warren M Grill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Computational modeling of autonomic nerve stimulation: Vagus et al.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Edgar PeñaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3148-8355
Nicole A PelotDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2844-0190
Warren M GrillDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5240-6588

Funding

RECONSTRUCTING VAGAL ANATOMY75N98022C00018 · OD · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI SHOFFSTALL, ANDREW · 2022 to 2024
$15.8M
Modeling Activation and Block of Autonomic Nerves for Analysis and DesignOT2OD025340 · OD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GRILL, WARREN M. · 2017 to 2021
$5.9M
NIH HHS 75N98022C00018NIH HHS OT2 OD025340
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeripheral nerve recordings can enhance the efficacy of neurostimulation therapies by providing a feedback signal to adjust stimulation settings for greater efficacy or reduced side effects. Computational models can accelerate the development of interfaces with high signal-to-noise ratio and selective recording. However, validation and tuning of model outputs against in vivo recordings remains computationally prohibitive due to the large number of fibers in a nerve.

methodsWe designed and implemented highly efficient modeling methods for simulating electrically evoked compound nerve action potential (CNAP) signals. The method simulated a subset of fiber diameters present in the nerve using NEURON, interpolated action potential templates across fiber diameters, and filtered the templates with a weighting function derived from fiber-specific conduction velocity and electromagnetic reciprocity outputs of a volume conductor model. We applied the methods to simulate CNAPs from rat cervical vagus nerve.

resultsBrute force simulation of a rat vagal CNAP with all 1,759 myelinated and 13,283 unmyelinated fibers in NEURON required 286 and 15,860 CPU hours, respectively, while filtering interpolated templates required 30 and 38 seconds on a desktop computer while maintaining accuracy. Modeled CNAP amplitude could vary by over two orders of magnitude depending on tissue conductivities and cuff opening within experimentally relevant ranges. Conduction distance and fiber diameter distribution also strongly influenced the modeled CNAP amplitude, shape, and latency. Modeled and in vivo signals had comparable shape, amplitude, and latency for myelinated fibers but not for unmyelinated fibers.

conclusionsHighly efficient methods of modeling neural recordings quantified the large impact that tissue properties, conduction distance, and nerve fiber parameters have on CNAPs. These methods expand the computational accessibility of neural recording models, enable efficient model tuning for validation, and facilitate the design of novel recording interfaces for neurostimulation feedback and understanding physiological systems.

Indexed as

Evoked PotentialsNerve FibersAction PotentialsAnimalsComputer SimulationNeural ConductionPeripheral NervesRats

Identifiers

PMID38427699
PMCPMC10936855

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.