ArticlePLoS computational biology2024
Computational models of compound nerve action potentials: Efficient filter-based methods to quantify effects of tissue conductivities, conduction distance, and nerve fiber parameters.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accelerating the development of bioelectronic medicine: outcomes and innovations from the NIH SPARC initiative.Bioelectronic medicine · 2026Review
- Multiscale biomimetic design for peripheral nerve repair: Beyond passive bridging.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Fabrication and osteogenic differentiation performance of the electrospun magnetic P(VDF-TrFE)/FeRSC advances · 2026Article
- The optimization of neuroprosthetic interfaces relying on biophysical and surrogate digital twins.npj biomedical innovations · 2026Review
- Correlation of Electrical Impedance and Evoked Potentials With Properties of the Electrode Interface Using in Situ Block-Face Imaging of the Rat Pelvic Nerve.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2025Article
- PyFibers: An open-source NEURON-Python package to simulate responses of model nerve fibers to electrical stimulation.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Simulation insights on the compound action potential in multifascicular nerves.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Biophysical characterization of the recording of unmyelinated and myelinated fiber activity with peripheral interfaces.iScience · 2025Article
- Guidance for sharing computational models of neural stimulation: from project planning to publication.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Review
- Computational modeling of autonomic nerve stimulation: Vagus et al.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- NRV: An open framework for in silico evaluation of peripheral nerve electrical stimulation strategies.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPeripheral nerve recordings can enhance the efficacy of neurostimulation therapies by providing a feedback signal to adjust stimulation settings for greater efficacy or reduced side effects. Computational models can accelerate the development of interfaces with high signal-to-noise ratio and selective recording. However, validation and tuning of model outputs against in vivo recordings remains computationally prohibitive due to the large number of fibers in a nerve.
methodsWe designed and implemented highly efficient modeling methods for simulating electrically evoked compound nerve action potential (CNAP) signals. The method simulated a subset of fiber diameters present in the nerve using NEURON, interpolated action potential templates across fiber diameters, and filtered the templates with a weighting function derived from fiber-specific conduction velocity and electromagnetic reciprocity outputs of a volume conductor model. We applied the methods to simulate CNAPs from rat cervical vagus nerve.
resultsBrute force simulation of a rat vagal CNAP with all 1,759 myelinated and 13,283 unmyelinated fibers in NEURON required 286 and 15,860 CPU hours, respectively, while filtering interpolated templates required 30 and 38 seconds on a desktop computer while maintaining accuracy. Modeled CNAP amplitude could vary by over two orders of magnitude depending on tissue conductivities and cuff opening within experimentally relevant ranges. Conduction distance and fiber diameter distribution also strongly influenced the modeled CNAP amplitude, shape, and latency. Modeled and in vivo signals had comparable shape, amplitude, and latency for myelinated fibers but not for unmyelinated fibers.
conclusionsHighly efficient methods of modeling neural recordings quantified the large impact that tissue properties, conduction distance, and nerve fiber parameters have on CNAPs. These methods expand the computational accessibility of neural recording models, enable efficient model tuning for validation, and facilitate the design of novel recording interfaces for neurostimulation feedback and understanding physiological systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.