Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38429285›Full record

ReviewCell death discovery2024

Mechanisms and significance of entosis for tumour growth and progression.

Ksenia Аndreevna Gaptulbarova, Irina Alexandrovna Tsydenova, Daria Sergeevna Dolgasheva, Ekaterina Andreevna Kravtsova, Marina Konstantinovna Ibragimova, Sergey Vladimirovich Vtorushin, Nikolai Vasilievich Litviakov

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell death discovery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Programmed cell death in human respiratory syncytial virus infection.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ksenia Аndreevna GaptulbarovaCancer Research Institute "Tomsk National Research Medical Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences", Kooperativniy Lane, 5, 634009, Tomsk, Russia. Xenia.gaptulbarova@yandex.ru.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1091-7528
Irina Alexandrovna TsydenovaCancer Research Institute "Tomsk National Research Medical Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences", Kooperativniy Lane, 5, 634009, Tomsk, Russia.
Daria Sergeevna DolgashevaCancer Research Institute "Tomsk National Research Medical Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences", Kooperativniy Lane, 5, 634009, Tomsk, Russia.
Ekaterina Andreevna KravtsovaCancer Research Institute "Tomsk National Research Medical Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences", Kooperativniy Lane, 5, 634009, Tomsk, Russia.
Marina Konstantinovna IbragimovaCancer Research Institute "Tomsk National Research Medical Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences", Kooperativniy Lane, 5, 634009, Tomsk, Russia.
Sergey Vladimirovich VtorushinCancer Research Institute "Tomsk National Research Medical Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences", Kooperativniy Lane, 5, 634009, Tomsk, Russia.
Nikolai Vasilievich LitviakovCancer Research Institute "Tomsk National Research Medical Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences", Kooperativniy Lane, 5, 634009, Tomsk, Russia.
Russian Academy of Sciences · RU

Funding

Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (Minobrnauka) 075-15-2021-1073Russian Science Foundation (RSF) 21-15-00243
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To date, numerous mechanisms have been identified in which one cell engulfs another, resulting in the creation of 'cell-in-cell' (CIC) structures, which subsequently cause cell death. One of the mechanisms of formation of these structures is entosis, which is presumably associated with possible carcinogenesis and tumour progression. The peculiarity of the process is that entotic cells themselves actively invade the host cell, and afterwards have several possible variants of fate. Entotic formations are structures where one cell is engulfed by another cell, creating a cell-in-cell structure. The nucleus of the outer cell has a crescent shape, while the inner cell is surrounded by a large entotic vacuole. These characteristics differentiate entosis from cell cannibalism. It's worth noting that entotic formations are not necessarily harmful and may even be beneficial in some cases. In this article we will consider the mechanism of entosis and variants of entotic cell death, and also put forward hypothesis about possible variants of participation of this process on the formation and progression of cancer. This article also presents our proposed classification of functional forms of entosis.

Identifiers

PMID38429285
PMCPMC10907354
OpenAlexW4392363546

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.