Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38430323›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2024

Lymph Node Dissection in Testicular Cancer: The State of the Art and Future Perspectives.

Bartosz Małkiewicz, Gabriela Świrkosz, Wojciech Lewandowski, Katarzyna Demska, Zuzanna Szczepaniak, Jakub Karwacki, Wojciech Krajewski, Tomasz Szydełko

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Nuclear medicine imaging in non-seminomatous germ cell tumors: lessons learned from the past failures.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Bartosz MałkiewiczDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland. bartosz.malkiewicz@umw.edu.pl.ORCID 0000-0002-5933-3753
Gabriela ŚwirkoszDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0009-0000-1467-7619
Wojciech LewandowskiDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Katarzyna DemskaDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Zuzanna SzczepaniakDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland. zuzanna.a.szczepaniak@gmail.com.
Jakub KarwackiDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0009-0005-4441-1877
Wojciech KrajewskiDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1727-2283
Tomasz SzydełkoUniversity Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1360-0422
Wroclaw Medical University · PL

Funding

Wroclaw Medical University SUBZ.C090.23.080
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of the evolving role of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) in the management of testicular cancer (TC). It explores the significance of RPLND as both a diagnostic and therapeutic tool, highlighting its contribution to accurate staging, its impact on oncological outcomes, and its influence on subsequent treatment decisions. RECENT

findingsRPLND serves as an essential diagnostic procedure, aiding in the precise assessment of lymph node involvement and guiding personalized treatment strategies. It has demonstrated therapeutic value, particularly in patients with specific risk factors and disease stages, contributing to improved oncological outcomes and survival rates. Recent studies have emphasized the importance of meticulous patient selection and nerve-sparing techniques to mitigate complications while optimizing outcomes. Additionally, modern imaging and surgical approaches have expanded the potential applications of RPLND. In the context of TC management, RPLND remains a valuable and evolving tool. Its dual role in staging and therapy underscores its relevance in contemporary urological practice. This review highlights the critical role of RPLND in enhancing patient care and shaping treatment strategies, emphasizing the need for further research to refine patient selection and surgical techniques.

Indexed as

Neoplasms, Germ Cell and EmbryonalTesticular NeoplasmsHumansLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesMaleNeoplasm StagingRetroperitoneal SpaceRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeLymphadenectomyLymph node metastasisRetroperitoneal lymph node dissectionRetroperitoneal lymph nodesTesticular cancer

Identifiers

PMID38430323
PMCPMC11021343
OpenAlexW4392347883

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.