Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38433202›Full record

SynthesisThe journal of headache and pain2024

The impact of primary headaches on disability outcomes: a literature review and meta-analysis to inform future iterations of the Global Burden of Disease study.

Marta Waliszewska-Prosół, Danilo Antonio Montisano, Mariola Antolak, Federico Bighiani, Francescantonio Cammarota, Ilaria Cetta, Michele Corrado, Keiko Ihara, Regina Kartamysheva, Igor Petrušić and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The journal of headache and pain, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
19.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Hallmarks of primary headache: part 3 - cluster headache.The journal of headache and pain · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 11 institutions in 5 countries.

Marta Waliszewska-Prosół *Department of Neurology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland. marta.waliszewska@gmail.com.
Danilo Antonio Montisano *Dipartimento Di Neuroalgologia, Centro Cefalee, Fondazione IRRCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy. danilo.montisano@istituto-besta.it.
Mariola AntolakDepartment of Neurology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Federico BighianiDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Francescantonio CammarotaDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Ilaria CettaNeuroimaging Research Unit and Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Michele CorradoDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Keiko IharaDepartment of Neurology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Regina KartamyshevaDepartment of Neurology, University Clinic of Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russian Federation.
Igor PetrušićFaculty of Physical Chemistry, Laboratory for Advanced Analysis of Neuroimages, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Maria Magdalena PocoraDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Tsubasa TakizawaDepartment of Neurology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Gloria VaghiDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Paolo Martelletti *Unitelma Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Barbara CorsoNeuroscience Institute, National Research Council, Padua, Italy.
Alberto Raggi *SC Neurologia, Salute Pubblica, Disabilità, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.
European Headache Federation School of Advanced Studies (EHF-SAS)
Fondazione Istituto Neurologico Nazionale Casimiro Mondino · ITFondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta · ITUniversity of Pavia · ITWroclaw Medical University · PLAshikaga Red Cross Hospital · JPKazan Federal University · RUKeio University · JPNeuroscience Institute · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Belgrade · RSVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe burden and disability associated with headaches are conceptualized and measured differently at patients' and populations' levels. At the patients' level, through patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs); at population level, through disability weights (DW) and years lived with a disability (YLDs) developed by the Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD). DW are 0-1 coefficients that address health loss and have been defined through lay descriptions. With this literature review, we aimed to provide a comprehensive analysis of disability in headache disorders, and to present a coefficient referring to patients' disability which might inform future GBD definitions of DW for headache disorders.

methodsWe searched SCOPUS and PubMed for papers published between 2015 and 2023 addressing disability in headache disorders. The selected manuscript included a reference to headache frequency and at least one PROM. A meta-analytic approach was carried out to address relevant differences for the most commonly used PROMs (by headache type, tertiles of medication intake, tertiles of females' percentage in the sample, and age). We developed a 0-1 coefficient based on the MIDAS, on the HIT-6, and on MIDAS + HIT-6 which was intended to promote future DW iterations by the GBD consortium.

resultsA total of 366 studies, 596 sub-samples, and more than 133,000 single patients were available, mostly referred to cases with migraine. Almost all PROMs showed the ability to differentiate disability severity across conditions and tertiles of medication intake. The indexes we developed can be used to inform future iterations of DW, in particular considering their ability to differentiate across age and tertiles of medication intake.

conclusionsOur review provides reference values for the most commonly used PROMS and a data-driven coefficient whose main added value is its ability to differentiate across tertiles of age and medication intake which underlie on one side the increased burden due to aging (it is likely connected to the increased impact of common comorbidities), and by the other side the increased burden due to medication consumption, which can be considered as a proxy for headache severity. Both elements should be considered when describing disability of headache disorders at population levels.

Indexed as

Headache DisordersMigraine DisordersAgingFemaleGlobal Burden of DiseaseHeadacheHumansBurdenCluster headacheDisabilityGBDMigraineTension-type headacheYLD

Identifiers

PMID38433202
PMCPMC10910736
OpenAlexW4392342887

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.