Evidence mapPaperPMID 38433736Full record

ArticleTopics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation2024

Co-design of the Spinal Cord Injury Health Maintenance Tool to Support Self-Management: A Mixed-Methods Approach.

James W Middleton, Mohit Arora, K Anne Sinnott Jerram, John Bourke, Melissa McCormick, Dimity O'Leary, Gerard Weber, Tony Lembke, Ashley Craig

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Development and Evaluation of a Persian-Language Self-Management Mobile Application for People With Spinal Cord Injury.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

James W MiddletonJohn Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW Australia.
Mohit AroraJohn Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW Australia.
K Anne Sinnott JerramJohn Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW Australia.
John BourkeJohn Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW Australia.
Melissa McCormickRoyal Rehab, Ryde NSW Australia.
Dimity O'LearyRoyal Rehab, Ryde NSW Australia.
Gerard WeberRoyal Rehab, Ryde NSW Australia.
Tony LembkeThe Alstonville Clinic, Alstonville, NSW Australia.
Ashley CraigJohn Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW Australia.
The University of Sydney · AURoyal Rehabilitation Centre · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is a lack of consumer-friendly tools to empower and support people living with spinal cord injury (SCI) to self-manage complex health needs in community. This article describes the co-design process of the new SCI Health Maintenance Tool (SCI-HMT). Methods: Co-design of the SCI-HMT using a mixed-methods approach included a rapid review, e-Delphi surveys with range of multidisciplinary health care professionals ( Results: The SCI-HMT (healthmaintenancetool.com) was developed based on participatory research with data synthesis from multiple sources. Five priority health maintenance issues for bladder, bowel, skin, pain, and autonomic dysreflexia were originally covered. Best practice recommendations, red flag conditions, referrals, and clinical pathways were agreed on through an e-Delphi technique. Qualitative analysis identified six broad key concepts for self-management, including early symptom recognition, role of SCI peers, knowledge sharing with primary care, general practitioners as gatekeepers, and shared decision-making and highlighted a need to place much stronger emphasis on mental health and well-being. Design workshops and end-user testing provided key insights about user experience, functionality, and content for the SCI-HMT. Conclusion: The co-design process engaging end users, including people with SCI and general practitioners, enabled a shared understanding of the problem and identification of important needs and how to meet them. Informed by this process, the SCI-HMT is a freely accessible resource supporting SCI self-management, shared decision-making, and early problem identification.

Indexed as

Autonomic DysreflexiaSpinal Cord InjuriesHealth PersonnelHumansMental HealthPainco-design processhealth promotionself-managementspinal cord injurytools

Identifiers

PMID38433736
PMCPMC10906369
OpenAlexW4391887849

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.