Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38433884›Full record

ReviewCanadian geriatrics journal : CGJ2024

The Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation to Parameter of Sarcopenia in Elderly People: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Novira Widajanti, Usman Hadi, Soebagijo Adi Soelistijo, Noer Halimatus Syakdiyah, Roudhona Rosaudyn, Hendy Bhaskara Perdana Putra

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Canadian geriatrics journal : CGJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Novira WidajantiDoctoral Program of Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Usman HadiFaculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga-Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Soebagijo Adi SoelistijoFaculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga-Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Noer Halimatus SyakdiyahFaculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga-Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Roudhona RosaudynFaculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga-Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Hendy Bhaskara Perdana PutraFaculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga-Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Airlangga University · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Vitamin D plays an essential role in promoting skeletal muscle metabolism. Several studies show that vitamin D may help the elderly prevent sarcopenia. Nevertheless, the outcome remains debatable. Our meta-analysis aimed to summarize the effect of vitamin D supplementation on sarcopenia-related parameters. Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane, Springer, SAGE Journals, and Scopus abstracts on 10th December 2021 for relevant studies. We included articles that studied the effect of vitamin D on muscle mass, muscle strength, and physical performance. The aim was to measure the muscle mass, muscle strength, and physical performance both at baseline and at the end of the intervention. Results: A total of 6,628 participants from 35 studies were included. Most of the studies used oral vitamin D, whereas only one study used intramuscular injection. The effect of vitamin D supplementation showed no effect on appendicular skeletal muscle mass (SMD = .05 [95% CI, .33 - .44], Conclusions: Vitamin D supplementation had minimal effect on sarcopenia-related parameters. Further research into understanding the role of Vitamin D in preventing the progressivity of sarcopenia still needs to be explored.

Indexed as

meta-analysismyogenesissarcopeniaskeletal musclesystematic reviewvitamin D

Identifiers

PMID38433884
PMCPMC10896205
OpenAlexW4392382093

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.