ArticleiScience2024
Dendritic effects of tDCS insights from a morphologically realistic model neuron.
Article in iScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Noninvasive nanosecond transcranial pulsed electric fields: deep-penetrating, high-field stimulation for suppressing hippocampal amyloid-β and improving cognitive function in an Alzheimer's disease model].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026Article
- Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines (2017-2025: An update) - endorsed by the European Society for Brain Stimulation (ESBS) and by the International Federation for Clinical Neurophysiology (IFCN).Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Review
- Intrinsic calcium resonance and its modulation: insights from computational modeling.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) induces subcellular compartmental-dependent polarization, maximal in the distal portions of axons and dendrites. Using a morphologically realistic neuron model, we simulated tDCS-induced membrane polarization of the apical dendrite. Thus, we investigated the differential dendritic effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS on membrane potential polarization along the dendritic structure and its subsequent effects on dendritic membrane resistance, excitatory postsynaptic potential amplitude, backpropagating action potential amplitude, input/output relations, and long-term synaptic plasticity. We further showed that the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS on the backpropagating action potential were asymmetric, and explained this asymmetry. Additionally, we showed that the effects on input/output relations were rather weak and limited to the low-mid range of stimulation frequencies, and that synaptic plasticity effects were mostly limited to the distal portion of the dendrite. Thus, we demonstrated how tDCS modifies dendritic physiology due to the dendrite's unique morphology and composition of voltage-gated ion channels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.