Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38436976›Full record

SynthesisJAMA internal medicine2024

Complication Rates of Central Venous Catheters: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Bijan Teja, Nicholas A Bosch, Calvin Diep, Tiago V Pereira, Paolo Mauricio, Michael C Sklar, Ashwin Sankar, Harindra C Wijeysundera, Refik Saskin, Allan Walkey and 2 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA internal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT06652191 (Effect of Central Venous Puncture Dilation and Non Dilation on the Success Rate of Catheterization), which is not on this map. Cited by 101 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06652191 naunknown statusnot on this map

Effect of Central Venous Puncture Dilation and Non Dilation on the Success Rate of Catheterization

TypeinterventionalSponsorSixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled336Conditionsthe Success Rate of Non Dilation on the Central Venous CatheterizationArmsDirect catheterization with non-dilation, Catheterization after expanding the skin with a dilator
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Beyond Bloodstream Infection: The Potential for Hierarchical Composite Endpoints in Vascular Access Research.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Vascular closure with a suture retention device versus suture-mediated closure system after large bore venous access for electrophysiologic procedures.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. AURA-CVC: Autonomous Ultrasound-guided Robotic Assistance for Central Venous Catheterization.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Bijan TejaInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Nicholas A BoschThe Pulmonary Center, Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Calvin DiepDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tiago V PereiraClinical Trial Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Paolo MauricioThe Pulmonary Center, Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Michael C SklarInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ashwin SankarDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Harindra C WijeysunderaDivision of Cardiology, Schulich Heart Program, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Refik SaskinICES Central, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Allan WalkeyDivision of Health Systems Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.
Duminda N WijeysunderaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Hannah WunschDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Central venous catheters (CVCs) are commonly used but are associated with complications. Quantifying complication rates is essential for guiding CVC utilization decisions. Objective: To summarize current rates of CVC-associated complications. Data Sources: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and CENTRAL databases were searched for observational studies and randomized clinical trials published between 2015 to 2023. Study Selection: This study included English-language observational studies and randomized clinical trials of adult patients that reported complication rates of short-term centrally inserted CVCs and data for 1 or more outcomes of interest. Studies that evaluated long-term intravascular devices, focused on dialysis catheters not typically used for medication administration, or studied catheters placed by radiologists were excluded. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis was applied to summarize event rates. Rates of placement complications (events/1000 catheters with 95% credible interval [CrI]) and use complications (events/1000 catheter-days with 95% CrI) were estimated. Main Outcomes and Measures: Ten prespecified complications associated with CVC placement (placement failure, arterial puncture, arterial cannulation, pneumothorax, bleeding events requiring action, nerve injury, arteriovenous fistula, cardiac tamponade, arrhythmia, and delay of ≥1 hour in vasopressor administration) and 5 prespecified complications associated with CVC use (malfunction, infection, deep vein thrombosis [DVT], thrombophlebitis, and venous stenosis) were assessed. The composite of 4 serious complications (arterial cannulation, pneumothorax, infection, or DVT) after CVC exposure for 3 days was also assessed. Results: Of 11 722 screened studies, 130 were included in the analyses. Seven of 15 prespecified complications were meta-analyzed. Placement failure occurred at 20.4 (95% CrI, 10.9-34.4) events per 1000 catheters placed. Other rates of CVC placement complications (per 1000 catheters) were arterial canulation (2.8; 95% CrI, 0.1-10), arterial puncture (16.2; 95% CrI, 11.5-22), and pneumothorax (4.4; 95% CrI, 2.7-6.5). Rates of CVC use complications (per 1000 catheter-days) were malfunction (5.5; 95% CrI, 0.6-38), infection (4.8; 95% CrI, 3.4-6.6), and DVT (2.7; 95% CrI, 1.0-6.2). It was estimated that 30.2 (95% CrI, 21.8-43.0) in 1000 patients with a CVC for 3 days would develop 1 or more serious complication (arterial cannulation, pneumothorax, infection, or DVT). Use of ultrasonography was associated with lower rates of arterial puncture (risk ratio [RR], 0.20; 95% CrI, 0.09-0.44; 13.5 events vs 68.8 events/1000 catheters) and pneumothorax (RR, 0.25; 95% CrI, 0.08-0.80; 2.4 events vs 9.9 events/1000 catheters). Conclusions and Relevance: Approximately 3% of CVC placements were associated with major complications. Use of ultrasonography guidance may reduce specific risks including arterial puncture and pneumothorax.

Indexed as

Catheterization, Central VenousCentral Venous CathetersCatheter-Related InfectionsHumans

Identifiers

PMID38436976
PMCPMC12285596

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.