Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38438268›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2024

The burden of acute eye conditions on different healthcare providers: a retrospective population-based study.

Anna Rawlings, Angharad E Hobby, Barbara Ryan, Andrew Carson-Stevens, Rachel North, Mathew Smith, Sioned Gwyn, Nik Sheen, Jennifer H Acton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Rise of Independent Prescribing by Optometrists in Wales 2020-2024: Number of Practices, Drugs and Costs.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. New-onset double vision in general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anna RawlingsSwansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea.ORCID 0000-0003-3929-474X
Angharad E HobbySchool of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, and University of the West of England, Bristol.ORCID 0000-0002-6007-2685
Barbara RyanSchool of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff.ORCID 0000-0003-3722-8757
Andrew Carson-StevensPRIME Centre Wales, Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff.ORCID 0000-0002-7580-7699
Rachel NorthSchool of Optometry and Vision Sciences and PRIME Centre Wales, Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff.ORCID 0000-0002-6657-5099
Mathew SmithSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff.ORCID 0000-0002-5697-0204
Sioned GwynPRIME Centre Wales, Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff.ORCID 0009-0005-5301-8356
Nik SheenHealth and Education Improvement Wales (HEIW), Nantgarw.ORCID 0000-0003-2746-8626
Jennifer H ActonSchool of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff.ORCID 0000-0002-0347-7651

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe demand for acute eyecare exponentially outstrips capacity. The public lacks awareness of community eyecare services.

aimTo quantify the burden of acute eyecare on different healthcare service providers in a national population through prescribing and medicines provision by GPs, optometrists, and pharmacists, and provision of care by accident and emergency (A&E) services. A secondary aim was to characterise some of the drivers of this burden. DESIGN AND

settingA retrospective data-linkage study set in Wales, UK.

methodAnalysis of datasets was undertaken from the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage Databank (GP and A&E), the Eye Health Examination Wales service (optometry), and the Common Ailments Scheme (pharmacy) during 2017-2018.

resultsA total of 173 999 acute eyecare episodes delivered by GPs (168 877 episodes) and A&E services (5122) were identified during the study. This resulted in 65.4 episodes of care per 1000 people per year. GPs prescribed a total of 87 973 653 prescriptions within the general population. Of these, 820 693 were related to acute eyecare, resulting in a prescribing rate of 0.9%. A total of 5122 eye-related and 905 224 general A&E attendances were identified, respectively, resulting in an A&E attendance rate of 0.6%. Optometrists and pharmacists managed 51.8% (116 868) and 0.6% (2635) of all episodes, respectively. Older females and infants of both sexes were more likely to use GP prescribing services, while adolescent and middle-aged males were more likely to visit A&E. GP prescribing burden was driven partially by economic deprivation, access to services, and health score. Season, day of the week, and time of day were predictors of burden in GP and A&E.

conclusionAcute eyecare continues to place considerable burden on GP and A&E services in Wales, particularly in urban areas with greater economic deprivation and lower overall health. This is likely to increase with a rapidly ageing population. With ongoing pathway development to better utilise optometry and pharmacy, and improved public awareness, there may be scope to change this trajectory.

Indexed as

OptometryAdolescentFemaleHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedPharmacistsRetrospective StudiesWalesemergency medicineeyegeneral practiceoptometrypharmacyprimary health care

Identifiers

PMID38438268
PMCPMC10947371

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.