Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38438589›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2024

Targeting Galectin 3 illuminates its contributions to the pathology of uterine serous carcinoma.

Yusuke Matoba, Dominique T Zarrella, Venkatesh Pooladanda, Maryam Azimi Mohammadabadi, Eugene Kim, Shaan Kumar, Mengyao Xu, Xingping Qin, Lauren J Ray, Kyle M Devins and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Androgen Signaling in Prostate Cancer: When a Friend Turns Foe.Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yusuke MatobaVincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2609-1778
Dominique T ZarrellaVincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Venkatesh PooladandaVincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Maryam Azimi MohammadabadiVincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Eugene KimVincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4815-5680
Shaan KumarVincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Mengyao XuVincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Xingping QinHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Lauren J RayDepartment of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Kyle M DevinsDepartment of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Raj KumarVincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Artem KononenkoVincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Eric EisenhauerHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Irva E VeillardVincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Wataru YamagamiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.
Sarah J HillHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9199-9459
Kristopher A SarosiekHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4618-5085
Oladapo O YekuVincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6319-1647
David R SpriggsVincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Bo R RuedaVincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. brueda@mgh.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9489-8699
Harvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USKeio University · JP

Funding

Developmental regulation of apoptosis as a modifiable driver of radiotherapy-induced neurocognitive impairment in pediatric patientsR37CA248565 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI Kristopher Andrew Sarosiek · 2020 to 2026
$2.6M
Dissecting the interaction between DNA damage repair defects and the tumor microenvironmentDP5OD029637 · OD · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI HILL, SARAH JAMES · 2020 to 2024
$2.2M
Identifying targetable apoptotic vulnerabilities for the treatment of AL amyloidosisR01DK125263 · NIDDK · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI SAROSIEK, KRISTOPHER ANDREW · 2020 to 2023
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS R37 CA248565NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK125263NIH HHS DP5 OD029637
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUterine serous cancer (USC) comprises around 10% of all uterine cancers. However, USC accounts for approximately 40% of uterine cancer deaths, which is attributed to tumor aggressiveness and limited effective treatment. Galectin 3 (Gal3) has been implicated in promoting aggressive features in some malignancies. However, Gal3's role in promoting USC pathology is lacking.

methodsWe explored the relationship between LGALS3 levels and prognosis in USC patients using TCGA database, and examined the association between Gal3 levels in primary USC tumors and clinical-pathological features. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Gal3-knockout (KO) and GB1107, inhibitor of Gal3, were employed to evaluate Gal3's impact on cell function.

resultsTCGA analysis revealed a worse prognosis for USC patients with high LGALS3. Patients with no-to-low Gal3 expression in primary tumors exhibited reduced clinical-pathological tumor progression. Gal3-KO and GB1107 reduced cell proliferation, stemness, adhesion, migration, and or invasion properties of USC lines. Furthermore, Gal3-positive conditioned media (CM) stimulated vascular tubal formation and branching and transition of fibroblast to cancer-associated fibroblast compared to Gal3-negative CM. Xenograft models emphasized the significance of Gal3 loss with fewer and smaller tumors compared to controls. Moreover, GB1107 impeded the growth of USC patient-derived organoids.

conclusionThese findings suggest inhibiting Gal3 may benefit USC patients.

Indexed as

Blood ProteinsCystadenocarcinoma, SerousGalectin 3Uterine NeoplasmsAnimalsCell Line, TumorCell MovementCell ProliferationFemaleGalectinsHumansMicePrognosisBlood ProteinsGalectin 3GalectinsLGALS3 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID38438589
PMCPMC11058234
OpenAlexW4392369438

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.