Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38438661›Full record

ReviewPharmacological reports : PR2024

The study of platelet aggregation using a microtiter plate reader ‒ methodological considerations.

Magdalena Boncler, Jacek Golański

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacological reports : PR, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Magdalena BonclerDepartment of Haemostasis and Haemostatic Disorders, Chair of Biomedical Sciences, Medical University of Łódź, ul. Mazowiecka 6/8, Łódź, 92-215, Poland. magdalena.boncler@umed.lodz.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4860-5338
Jacek GolańskiDepartment of Haemostasis and Haemostatic Disorders, Chair of Biomedical Sciences, Medical University of Łódź, ul. Mazowiecka 6/8, Łódź, 92-215, Poland.

Funding

Uniwersytet Medyczny w Lodzi 503/6-020-01/503-61-001-19-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optical aggregometry by 96-well plate assay, the microplate method, is a fast, efficient, and readily available method for measuring the pharmacological effects of antiplatelet drugs. Even though recent years have witnessed growing interest in adopting the microplate method for widespread use, it remains in the shadow of the standard light transmission aggregometry (LTA). Regardless of the method used, the results of platelet aggregation depend on a variety of factors and often vary among laboratories worldwide. While several methodological papers have examined the microplate method, no standards have been established, most likely because the approach is not used as a diagnostic tool. Currently, the microplate method is recommended by researchers to be used in conjunction with LTA or as an adjunct to LTA. This raises the question of whether an optimal protocol exists for microplate aggregometry, and what are the key considerations in a good experimental protocol for obtaining reliable results? This article attempts to address these questions by summarizing the knowledge accumulated in this field over the last three decades.

Indexed as

Platelet AggregationPlatelet Function TestsBlood PlateletsPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsReference StandardsPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsBlood plateletsPlatelet aggregationPlatelet function tests

Identifiers

PMID38438661

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.