Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38440225›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2024

Efficacy of pembrolizumab in advanced cancer of the vulva: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.

Roxana Schwab, Lina Judit Schiestl, Lorena Cascant Ortolano, Philip Herbert Klecker, Mona Wanda Schmidt, Katrin Almstedt, Anne-Sophie Heimes, Walburgis Brenner, Kathrin Stewen, Marcus Schmidt and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia and vulvar cancer].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Immune checkpoint inhibitors in gynecologic oncology: Current status and perspectives.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Comprehensive management of vulvovaginal cancers.CA: a cancer journal for clinicians
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Roxana Schwab *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Lina Judit Schiestl *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Lorena Cascant OrtolanoDepartmental Library, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Philip Herbert KleckerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Mona Wanda SchmidtDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Katrin AlmstedtDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Anne-Sophie HeimesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Walburgis BrennerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Kathrin StewenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Marcus SchmidtDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Annette HasenburgDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Vulvar cancer carries a favourable prognosis in early stages. However, therapeutic options for advanced or recurrent cases are limited despite a variety of therapeutic modalities, such as extensive surgical resection, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. The most important emerging treatment modalities are immune checkpoint inhibitors. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, in women with advanced vulvar cancer. Materials and methods: Following a comprehensive search, review, and appraisal, two relevant single-arm studies were included. Meta-analysis was conducted using R4.3.0 software and RStudio 2023.03.0, presenting the overall effect size with a 95% confidence interval. Heterogeneity was assessed using I Results: Out of 154 studies screened for eligibility, two single-arm studies involving 119 patients receiving pembrolizumab for advanced vulvar cancer were included. The pooled objective response rate (ORR) was overall 10% (95% CI: 0.00-0.84) and 9% (95% CI: 0.00-0.89) in the PD-L1 positive subgroup. In the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, 31% (95% CI: 0.04-0.85) exhibited any clinical benefit (complete response, partial response, or stable disease). In the ITT population at six months, progression-free survival (PFS) was 19% (95% CI: 0.01-0.82), and overall survival (OS) was 48% (95% CI: 0.08-0.90). At 12 months, PFS decreased to 9% (95% CI: 0.00-0.85), and OS was 33% (95% CI: 0.04-0.85). No statistically significant heterogeneity was observed in PFS and OS analyses. Discussion and conclusion: This study suggests that one-third of women with advanced or recurrent vulvar cancer may, without the influence of PD-L1 status, benefit from pembrolizumab treatment despite a decline in both PFS and OS at 12 months. These findings provide support for considering pembrolizumab in the treatment paradigm for this specific subset of cancer patients. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023391888.

Indexed as

immune checkpoint inhibitormeta-analysisPD-1PD-L1pembrolizumabvulvar cancer

Identifiers

PMID38440225
PMCPMC10910062
OpenAlexW4391929323

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.