Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38440964›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology2024

Evaluation of endometrial receptivity in recurrent pregnancy loss and recurrent implantation failure.

Sultan Canan, Mehmet Arda İnan, Ahmet Erdem, Erhan Demirdağ, Mualla İlknur Gündüz, Özlem Erdem, Mehmet Erdem

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sultan CananSakarya Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sakarya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-4995-8194
Mehmet Arda İnanGazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-6179-2828
Ahmet ErdemGazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-9944-6894
Erhan DemirdağGazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-4599-3854
Mualla İlknur GündüzGazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-3817-1062
Özlem ErdemGazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-5981-4856
Mehmet ErdemGazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-1939-7138
Gazi University · TRSakarya Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The cause of implantation defects in patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) and recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) has not been clearly established. We aimed to evaluate the immunohistochemical changes in HOXA-11, β1 integrin, focal adhesion kinase (FAK), cluster of differentiation 44 (CD44), and extracellular matrix protein 1 (ECM1) molecules during the receptive endometrial period in patients with RIF and RPL. Materials and Methods: This study was retrospectively conducted at a university hospital. After the exclusion of cases with pathology that may cause a change in the level of receptors in the endometrium, biopsies performed during the receptive period were selected, and the patients were categorized into RPL (n=15), RIF (n=16), control (n=16) groups. All preparations were immunohistochemically stained for HOXA-11, β1 integrin, FAK, CD44, and ECM1. Results: HOXA-11 and β1 Integrin expression changes were similar between the RIF and control groups. However, FAK expression was significantly increased in the RIF group (p<0.01). Additionally, ECM1 and CD44 expressions were significantly decreased in the RIF group compared with the control group (p<0.01). There was no significant difference in the endometrial staining of HOXA-11, FAK, and ECM1 in patients with a history of RPL. However, β1 Integrin and CD44 levels were significantly decreased in the RPL group compared with the control group (p<0.05). Conclusion: Implantation is a complex process, and altered adhesion mechanisms involved in endometrial receptivity may be related to defective implantation in patients with RIF and RPL. Among the adhesion molecules, the expression of CD44, β1 integrin, FAK, and ECM1 molecules varies in inappropriate implantation compared with the normal population.

Indexed as

Adhesion moleculesendometrial receptivityimplantationrecurrent implantation failurerecurrent pregnancy loss

Identifiers

PMID38440964
PMCPMC10920968
OpenAlexW4392369510

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.