ArticleNature communications2024
Machine learning-aided design and screening of an emergent protein function in synthetic cells.
Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated synthetic cell-based screening for designed proteins with emergent functions.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Multi-gene Co-expression systems inSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026Review
- Research Progress in Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Preparation of High-Quality Biomaterials.ACS omega · 2026Review
- Molecular systems engineering of synthetic cells.Nature chemistry · 2026Review
- Formulation of Recombinant Therapeutic Proteins: Technological Innovation, Regulations, and Evolution Towards Buffer-Free Formulations.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Nanocarriers for intracellular delivery of proteins in biomedical applications: strategies and recent advances.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2024Review
- Revolutionizing Molecular Design for Innovative Therapeutic Applications through Artificial Intelligence.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- N-Terminal Amino Acid Affects the Translation Efficiency at Lower Temperatures in a Reconstituted Protein Synthesis System.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently, utilization of Machine Learning (ML) has led to astonishing progress in computational protein design, bringing into reach the targeted engineering of proteins for industrial and biomedical applications. However, the design of proteins for emergent functions of core relevance to cells, such as the ability to spatiotemporally self-organize and thereby structure the cellular space, is still extremely challenging. While on the generative side conditional generative models and multi-state design are on the rise, for emergent functions there is a lack of tailored screening methods as typically needed in a protein design project, both computational and experimental. Here we describe a proof-of-principle of how such screening, in silico and in vitro, can be achieved for ML-generated variants of a protein that forms intracellular spatiotemporal patterns. For computational screening we use a structure-based divide-and-conquer approach to find the most promising candidates, while for the subsequent in vitro screening we use synthetic cell-mimics as established by Bottom-Up Synthetic Biology. We then show that the best screened candidate can indeed completely substitute the wildtype gene in Escherichia coli. These results raise great hopes for the next level of synthetic biology, where ML-designed synthetic proteins will be used to engineer cellular functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.