Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38444744›Full record

ReviewNanotheranostics2024

Surface engineered nanohybrids in plasmonic photothermal therapy for cancer: Regulatory and translational challenges.

Monalisha Debnath, Sujit Kumar Debnath, Mangal Vishnu Talpade, Shweta Bhatt, Prem Prakash Gupta, Rohit Srivastava

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nanotheranostics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Electromagnetic-Thermal Coupling Competition in Ag@TiONanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Engineered MoSNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Evaluation of CoFeInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Monalisha DebnathDepartment of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India.
Sujit Kumar DebnathDepartment of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India.
Mangal Vishnu TalpadeDepartment of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India.
Shweta BhattDepartment of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India.
Prem Prakash GuptaDepartment of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India.
Rohit SrivastavaDepartment of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India.
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plasmonic materials as non-invasive and selective treatment strategies are gaining increasing attention in the healthcare sector due to their remarkable optical and electronic properties, where the interface between matter and light becomes enhanced and highly localized. Some attractive applications of plasmonic materials in healthcare include drug delivery to target specific tissues or cells, hence reducing the side effects of the drug and improving their efficacy; enhancing the contrast and resolution in bioimaging; and selectively heating and destroying the cancerous cells while parting the healthy cells. Despite such advancements in photothermal therapy for cancer treatment, some limitations are still challenging. These include poor photothermal conversion efficiency, heat resistance, less accumulation in the tumor microenvironment, poor biosafety of photothermal agents, damage to the surrounding healthy tissues, post-treatment inflammatory responses, etc. Even though the clinical application of photothermal therapy is primarily restricted due to poor tissue penetration of excitation light, enzyme therapy is hindered due to less therapeutic efficacy. Several multimodal strategies, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, photodynamic therapy, and immunotherapy were developed to circumvent these side effects associated with plasmonic photothermal agents for effective mild-temperature photothermal therapy. It can be prophesied that the nanohybrid platform could pave the way for developing cutting-edge multifunctional precise nanomedicine via an ecologically sustainable approach towards cancer therapy. In the present review, we have highlighted the significant challenges of photothermal therapy from the laboratory to the clinical setting and their struggle to get approval from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPhotothermal TherapyDrug Delivery SystemsHot TemperatureHumansImmunotherapyTumor MicroenvironmentUnited StatesnanohybridNIRphotodynamicphotothermalplasmonic

Identifiers

PMID38444744
PMCPMC10911973
OpenAlexW4391973897

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.