Evidence mapPaperPMID 38445175Full record

ArticleMethodsX2024

Preparation of a universally usable, animal product free, defined medium for 2D and 3D culturing of normal and cancer cells.

Tilo Weber, Jeffrey Bajramovic, Stina Oredsson

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Establishment of human-relevantFrontiers in toxicology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tilo WeberAnimal Welfare Academy of the German Animal Welfare Federation, Neubiberg 85579, Federal Republic of Germany.
Jeffrey Bajramovic3Rs Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3584 CJ, The Netherlands.
Stina OredssonDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund 22362, Sweden.
Lund University · SEUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since 1958, cell culture media supplemented with fetal bovine serum is used, despite the well-known concerns about animal welfare, reproducibility, reliability, relevance, and safety. To obliterate these concerns and increase scientific accuracy, we recently published an open access, publicly available paper on a defined medium composition to make it possible for any lab to prepare this medium. The medium supports routine culturing and cell banking as well as investigations of growth curves, dose response testing of compounds of cells in 2D and 3D, and cell migration; all important aspects for research and toxicology. Here we give a detailed description of how to mix the defined universal cell culture medium in 14 simple steps to support any entity that wishes to make it. We also list different normal and cancer cell lines that have been cultured in the defined medium.•Open source composition of animal product free universal cell culture medium•Protocols for mixing solutions of small xeno free molecules for supplementation•Protocols for mixing solutions of human proteins for supplementation.

Indexed as

Animal free mediumCell cultureDefined mediumEthically acceptableHuman proteinsProtocols for mixing animal product free defined cell culture mediumReproducible composition

Identifiers

PMID38445175
PMCPMC10912720
OpenAlexW4391515190

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.