Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38445447›Full record

ReviewDementia (London, England)2024

Increased community engagement of Indigenous Peoples in dementia research leads to higher context relevance of results.

Tonya M Kjerland, Shawnda Schroeder, Va'atausili Tofaeono, Melissa Walls, Joseph P Gone

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dementia (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tonya M KjerlandDepartment of Indigenous Health, University of North Dakota, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-8971-8495
Shawnda SchroederDepartment of Indigenous Health, University of North Dakota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5733-4285
Va'atausili TofaeonoDepartment of Indigenous Health, University of North Dakota, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-2732-9246
Melissa WallsDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6324-457X
Joseph P GoneDepartment of Anthropology, Harvard University, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0572-1179
University of North Dakota · USHarvard University · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHealth research that focuses on Indigenous Peoples must ensure that the community in question is actively engaged, and that the results have context relevance for Indigenous Peoples. Context relevance is "the benefits, usability, and respectful conduct of research from the perspective of Indigenous communities." The purpose of this study was to apply two tools within an already-published scoping review of 76 articles featuring research on cognitive impairment and dementia among Indigenous Peoples worldwide. One tool assessed levels of community engagement reported in the corpus, and the other tool assessed the context relevance of recommendations in the corpus. We hypothesized that research with higher levels of reported community engagement would produce recommendations with greater context relevance for Indigenous Peoples.

methodsWe employed semi-structured deductive coding using two novel tools assessing levels of reported community engagement and context relevance of recommendations based on studies included in the existing scoping review.

resultsApplication of the two tools revealed a positive relationship between increasing community engagement and greater context relevance. Community engagement primarily occurred in studies conducted with First Nations, Inuit, and Métis populations in Canada and with Australian Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander Peoples. Research with Alaska Native, American Indian, and Native Hawaiian Peoples in the USA stood out for its comparative lack of meaningful community engagement. DISCUSSION: There is opportunity to utilize these tools, and the results of this assessment, to enhance training and mentorship for researchers who work with Indigenous populations. There is a need to increase investigator capacity to involve communities throughout all phases of research, particularly in the pre-research stages.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationDementiaIndigenous PeoplesAustraliaAustralian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander PeoplesCanadaHumansUnited StatesAlzheimer’scognitive impairmentcommunity-based participatory researchcommunity engagementcontext relevancedementiaIndigenous populations

Identifiers

PMID38445447
PMCPMC11059836
OpenAlexW4392516997

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.