Trial reportEuropean heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging2024
Plasma lipidomics and coronary plaque changes: a substudy of the SMARTool clinical trial.
Trial report in European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integration of lipidomic and polygenic risk scores within contemporary clinical cardiovascular risk assessment pathways: a multi-cohort development and validation study.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Molecular Basis of Adipose-Cardiac Crosstalk in Cardiovascular Diseases: From Mechanisms to Therapeutic Opportunities.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Screening for high coronary plaque volume in primary prevention: integration of multi-omics and coronary calcium scoring into cardiovascular risk assessment.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Health improvements by understanding residual risk in coronary artery disease and new targets for prevention/treatment: rationale and research protocol of the HURRICANE project.European heart journal open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo date, no studies have investigated the association between lipid species and coronary plaque changes over time, quantitatively assessed by serial imaging. We aimed to prospectively determine the association between lipid species quantified by a plasma lipidomic analysis and coronary plaque changes according to composition assessed by a quantitative serial analysis of coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA). METHODS AND
resultsPatients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing baseline coronary CTA were prospectively enrolled by seven EU centres in the SMARTool study and submitted to clinical, molecular, and coronary CTA re-evaluation at follow-up (an inter-scan period of 6.39 ± 1.17 years). Out of 202 patients who were analysed in the SMARTool main clinical study, a lipidomic analysis was performed in 154 patients before the baseline coronary CTA, and this group was included in the present study. A quantitative CTA analysis was performed by using a separate core laboratory blinded from clinical data. In the univariable analysis, it was found that no lipid species were significantly associated with annual total and calcified plaque changes. After adjusting for clinical variables at baseline and statin use, it was found that three lipid species were significantly associated with non-calcified plaque progression. In detail, cholesteryl ester(20:3), sphingomyelin (SM)(40:3), and SM(41:1) were found to be positively related to non-calcified plaque progression (Bonferroni-adjusted P-values = 0.005, 0.016, and 0.004, respectively).
conclusionThe current study showed an independent relationship between specific lipid species determined by a plasma lipidomic analysis and non-calcified coronary plaque progression assessed by a serial, quantitative coronary CTA analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.