ArticleScientific reports2024
Optimizing lifestyle profiles is potential for preventing nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and enhancing its survival.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prospective association between biological aging and risk of hospital-diagnosed MASLD: evidence from the UK Biobank.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Association between dietary flavonoids intake and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease especially in non-smokers: a cross-sectional study in US adults.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between lifestyle profile and disease incidence/mortality in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Lifestyle profiles ascertainment was based on the latent profile analysis. The associations of lifestyle profile and outcomes were analyzed by multivariate logistic or Cox regressions. Four lifestyle profiles (profile 1 and 2 for male, profile 3 and 4 for female) were established for all participants. Compared to profile 1, profile 2 (P = 0.042) and profile 3 (P = 0.013) had lower incidence for NAFLD. In contrast, profile 4 showed similar NAFLD prevalence compared to profile 1 (P = 0.756). Individuals with NAFLD within profile 3 had the best long-term survival, and the HR was 0.55 (95% CI 0.40-0.76) for all-cause mortality (compared to profile 1). Profile 4 (P = 0.098) and profile 2 (P = 0.546) had similar all-cause survival compared to profile 1. We explored the associations of healthy lifestyle score with mortality and incidence of NAFLD stratified by lifestyle profiles. We observed that with the increase of healthy lifestyle score, participants within profile 2 did not display lower NAFLD incidence and better long-term survival in NAFLD cases. In this study, lifestyle profiles were constructed in NHANES participants. The distinct lifestyle profiles may help optimize decision-making regarding lifestyle management in preventing NAFLD development, as well as selection of a more personalized approach for improving NAFLD survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.