Evidence mapPaperPMID 38448804Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2024

Cost-effectiveness of prehabilitation of elderly frail or pre-frail patients prior to elective surgery (PRAEP-GO) versus usual care - Protocol for a health economic evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial.

Helene Eckhardt, Wilm Quentin, Julia Silzle, Reinhard Busse, Tanja Rombey

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04418271 (Prehabilitation of Elderly Frail or Pre-frail Patients Prior to Elective Surgery - a Randomized Controlled Multicenter Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04418271 nacompletednot on this map

Prehabilitation of Elderly Frail or Pre-frail Patients Prior to Elective Surgery - a Randomized Controlled Multicenter Study (PRAEP-Go)

TypeinterventionalSponsorCharite University, Berlin, GermanyRan2020 to 2024Enrolled1,199ConditionsFrailty, Frail ElderlyArmsPrehabilitation- new form of care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Nutritional prehabilitation strategies in abdominal surgery.Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Helene EckhardtDepartment of Health Care Management, Institute of Technology and Management, Technische Universität Berlin, Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623, Berlin, Germany. helene.eckhardt@tu-berlin.de.ORCID 0000-0002-3921-428X
Wilm QuentinDepartment of Health Care Management, Institute of Technology and Management, Technische Universität Berlin, Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1705-6524
Julia SilzleDepartment of Health Care Management, Institute of Technology and Management, Technische Universität Berlin, Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5707-0267
Reinhard BusseDepartment of Health Care Management, Institute of Technology and Management, Technische Universität Berlin, Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4961-9130
Tanja RombeyDepartment of Health Care Management, Institute of Technology and Management, Technische Universität Berlin, Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5777-9738
Technische Universität Berlin · DE

Funding

Innovation Fund coordinated by the Innovation Committee of the Federal Joint Committee in Germany (Innovationsausschuss beim Gemeinsamen Bundesausschuss (G-BA)) 01NVF18024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrehabilitation aims to improve patients' functional capacity before surgery to reduce perioperative complications, promote recovery and decrease probability of disability. The planned economic evaluation is performed alongside a large German multi-centre pragmatic, two-arm parallel-group, randomized controlled trial on prehabilitation for frail elderly patients before elective surgery compared to standard care (PRAEP-GO RCT). The aim is to determine the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of prehabilitation for frail elderly before an elective surgery.

methodsThe planned health economic evaluation comprises cost-effectiveness, and cost-utility analyses. Analyses are conducted in the German context from different perspectives including the payer perspective, i.e. the statutory health insurance, the societal perspective and the health care provider perspective. Data on outcomes and costs, are collected alongside the ongoing PRAEP-GO RCT. The trial population includes frail or pre-frail patients aged ≥70 years with planned elective surgery. The intervention consists of frailty screening (Fried phenotype), a shared decision-making conference determining modality (physiotherapy and unsupervised physical exercises, nutrition counselling, etc.) and setting (inpatient, day care, outpatient etc.) of a 3-week individual multimodal prehabilitation prior to surgery. The control group receives standard preoperative care. Costs include the intervention costs, the costs of the index hospital stay for surgery, and health care resources consumed during a 12-month follow-up. Clinical effectiveness outcomes included in the economic evaluation are the level of care dependency, the degree of disability as measured by the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0), quality-adjusted life years (QALY) derived from the EQ-5D-5L and the German utility set, and complications occurring during the index hospital stay. Each adopted perspective considers different types of costs and outcomes as outlined in the protocol. All analyses will feature Intention-To-Treat analysis. To explore methodological and parametric uncertainties, we will conduct probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses. Subgroup analyses will be performed as secondary analyses. DISCUSSION: The health economic evaluation will provide insights into the cost-effectiveness of prehabilitation in older frail populations, informing decision-making processes and contributing to the evidence base in this field. Potential limitation includes a highly heterogeneous trial population.

trial registrationPRAEP-GO RCT: NCT04418271; economic evaluation: OSF ( https://osf.io/ecm74 ).

Indexed as

Frail ElderlyPreoperative ExerciseAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansInpatientsMulticenter Studies as TopicOutpatientsPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCost-effectiveness analysisFrailtyHealth care economicsHealth care evaluation mechanismsPrehabilitationPreoperative exerciseTrial-based health economic evaluation

Identifiers

PMID38448804
PMCPMC10916129
OpenAlexW4392510295

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.