Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38448939›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Disruption of hospital care during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic impacted socioeconomic groups differently: population based study using routine registration data.

Tessa Jansen, Sigur Gouwens, Lotta Meijerink, Iris Meulman, Lisanne H J A Kouwenberg, G Ardine de Wit, Johan J Polder, Anton E Kunst, Ellen Uiters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. From test to rest: evaluating socioeconomic differences along the COVID-19 care pathway in the Netherlands.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024
    Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tessa JansenCentre for Public Health, Healthcare, and Society, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), PO Box 1, 3720, BA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands. tessa.jansen@rivm.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2948-0533
Sigur GouwensTranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, 5000, LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-7515-5638
Lotta MeijerinkTranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, 5000, LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1511-6781
Iris MeulmanTranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, 5000, LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9916-1810
Lisanne H J A KouwenbergCentre for Public Health, Healthcare, and Society, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), PO Box 1, 3720, BA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7027-8249
G Ardine de WitCentre for Public Health, Healthcare, and Society, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), PO Box 1, 3720, BA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1375-7657
Johan J PolderTranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, 5000, LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3231-2178
Anton E KunstDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science & Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3313-5273
Ellen UitersCentre for Public Health, Healthcare, and Society, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), PO Box 1, 3720, BA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4404-2117

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, provision of non-COVID healthcare was recurrently severely disrupted. The objective was to determine whether disruption of non-COVID hospital use, either due to cancelled, postponed, or forgone care, during the first pandemic year of COVID-19 impacted socioeconomic groups differently compared with pre-pandemic use.

methodsNational population registry data, individually linked with data of non-COVID hospital use in the Netherlands (2017-2020). in non-institutionalised population of 25-79 years, in standardised household income deciles (1 = low, 10 = high) as proxy for socioeconomic status. Generic outcome measures included patients who received hospital care (dichotomous): outpatient contact, day treatment, inpatient clinic, and surgery. Specific procedures were included as examples of frequently performed elective and acute procedures, e.g.: elective knee/hip replacement and cataract surgery, and acute percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Relative risks (RR) for hospital use were reported as outcomes from generalised linear regression models (binomial) with log-link. An interaction term was included to assess whether income differences in hospital use during the pandemic deviated from pre-pandemic use.

resultsHospital use rates declined in 2020 across all income groups. With baseline (2019) higher hospital use rates among lower than higher income groups, relatively stronger declines were found for lower income groups. The lowest income groups experienced a 10% larger decline in surgery received than the highest income group (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.87 - 0.93). Patterns were similar for inpatient clinic, elective knee/hip replacement and cataract surgery. We found small or no significant income differences for outpatient clinic, day treatment, and acute PCI.

conclusionsDisruption of non-COVID hospital use in 2020 was substantial across all income groups during the acute phases of the pandemic, but relatively stronger for lower income groups than could be expected compared with pre-pandemic hospital use. Although the pandemic's impact on the health system was unprecedented, healthcare service shortages are here to stay. It is therefore pivotal to realise that lower income groups may be at risk for underuse in times of scarcity.

Indexed as

CataractCOVID-19Percutaneous Coronary InterventionAmbulatory Care FacilitiesHospitalsHumansPandemicsPovertyCOVID-19Healthcare disparitiesHealth servicesSocioeconomic factors

Identifiers

PMID38448939
PMCPMC10918870

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.