ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024
Machine learning to predict continuous protein properties from binary cell sorting data and map unseen sequence space.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- The evolution of display technologies for antibody drug discovery.Trends in biotechnology · 2026Review
- CaProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025Article
- Reaching New Heights in Genetic Code Manipulation with High Throughput Screening.Chemical reviews · 2024Review
- Article
- Machine learning to predict continuous protein properties from binary cell sorting data and map unseen sequence space.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Proteins are a diverse class of biomolecules responsible for wide-ranging cellular functions, from catalyzing reactions to recognizing pathogens. The ability to evolve proteins rapidly and inexpensively toward improved properties is a common objective for protein engineers. Powerful high-throughput methods like fluorescent activated cell sorting and next-generation sequencing have dramatically improved directed evolution experiments. However, it is unclear how to best leverage these data to characterize protein fitness landscapes more completely and identify lead candidates. In this work, we develop a simple yet powerful framework to improve protein optimization by predicting continuous protein properties from simple directed evolution experiments using interpretable, linear machine learning models. Importantly, we find that these models, which use data from simple but imprecise experimental estimates of protein fitness, have predictive capabilities that approach more precise but expensive data. Evaluated across five diverse protein engineering tasks, continuous properties are consistently predicted from readily available deep sequencing data, demonstrating that protein fitness space can be reasonably well modeled by linear relationships among sequence mutations. To prospectively test the utility of this approach, we generated a library of stapled peptides and applied the framework to predict affinity and specificity from simple cell sorting data. We then coupled integer linear programming, a method to optimize protein fitness from linear weights, with mutation scores from machine learning to identify variants in unseen sequence space that have improved and co-optimal properties. This approach represents a versatile tool for improved analysis and identification of protein variants across many domains of protein engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.