Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38452151›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Development of a patient satisfaction questionnaire (PSQ) for diabetes management in Thailand and Lao PDR.

Phayom Sookaneknun Olson, Chanuttha Ploylearmsang, Phoutsathaphone Sibounheuang, Santiparp Sookaneknun, Chanthanom Manithip, Suntaree Watcharadamrongkun, Paul W Jungnickel, Pattarin Kittiboonyakun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Development and Validation of a Culturally Adapted Patient-Reported Experience Measure for Diabetes Care in Thailand: Mixed-Methods Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Phayom Sookaneknun OlsonFaculty of Pharmacy, International Primary Care Practice Research Unit, Mahasarakham University, Khamriang Sub-District, Kantarawichai District, Maha Sarakham, Thailand.
Chanuttha PloylearmsangFaculty of Pharmacy, International Primary Care Practice Research Unit, Mahasarakham University, Khamriang Sub-District, Kantarawichai District, Maha Sarakham, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-8158-0312
Phoutsathaphone SibounheuangFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Health Sciences, Kao Ngot Villagem, Sisattanak District, Vientiane Capital, Lao PDR.
Santiparp SookaneknunMahasarakham Business School, Mahasarakham University, Khamriang Sub-District, Kantarawichai District, Maha Sarakham, Thailand.
Chanthanom ManithipMinistry of Health, Ban Thatkhao, Sisattanack District, Rue Simeuang, Lao PDR.
Suntaree WatcharadamrongkunFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-3955-4727
Paul W JungnickelDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Harrison College of Pharmacy, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, United States of America.
Pattarin KittiboonyakunFaculty of Pharmacy, Health Service and Pharmacy Practice Research and Innovation Unit, Mahasarakham University, Khamriang Sub-District, Kantarawichai District, Maha Sarakham, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a cross-sectional analytical study, a Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ) for diabetes management was developed and tested in Thailand and Lao PDR. A systematic review of qualitative studies was conducted to formulate themes of the PSQ. The 20-item PSQ was prepared in Thai and translated to Lao, with subsequent backward translation. Both versions were tested for reliability and construct validity using confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling. The study was performed at a university hospital in Thailand and two central hospitals in Vientiane, Lao PDR. There were 300 diabetic patients from Thailand (n = 150) and Lao PDR (n = 150). The 5-factor Thai version showed 74.52% of total explained variance with good internal consistency and satisfactory goodness-of-fit indices (χ2/df = 1.91, GFI = 0.83, CFI = 0.98, SRMR = 0.063, RMSEA = 0.078). The five factors were 1) Standard of Service, 2) Diabetic Service, 3) Competency of Providers, 4) Competency of Pharmacists, and 5) Communication with Providers. For the Lao version, 20 items showed a 3-factor structure with a total explained variance of 71.09%. Goodness-of-fit indices for the Lao model were satisfactory (χ2/df = 2.45, GFI = 0.78, CFI = 0.95, SRMR = 0.075 and RMSEA = 0.095). The results showed the PSQ Thai and Lao versions were valid and reliable for assessing patient satisfaction with diabetes management, however more testing of the questionnaire is appropriate.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusPatient SatisfactionSurveys and QuestionnairesCross-Sectional StudiesHospitals, UniversityHumansLaosPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSystematic Reviews as TopicThailand

Identifiers

PMID38452151
PMCPMC10919862

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.