Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38453821›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research communications2024

Evaluation of oral supplementation of free and nanoencapsulated Minthostachys verticillata essential oil on immunological, biochemical and antioxidants parameters and gut microbiota in weaned piglets.

Ivana D Montironi, Sofía Arsaute, Dardo A Roma, María E Cecchini, Agustina Pinotti, Fernando Mañas, Fernando A Bessone, Alejandra de Moreno de LeBlanc, Fabrisio E Alustiza, Romina V Bellingeri and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ivana D Montironi *Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Físico-Químicas y Naturales, Departamento de Microbiología e Inmunología, Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto, Río Cuarto, Córdoba, 5800, Argentina.
Sofía Arsaute *Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Físico-Químicas y Naturales, Departamento de Microbiología e Inmunología, Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto, Río Cuarto, Córdoba, 5800, Argentina.
Dardo A RomaFacultad de Agronomía y Veterinaria. Cátedra de Farmacología, Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto, Río Cuarto, Córdoba, 5800, Argentina.
María E CecchiniFacultad de Ciencias Exactas Físico-Químicas y Naturales, Departamento de Microbiología e Inmunología, Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto, Río Cuarto, Córdoba, 5800, Argentina.
Agustina PinottiInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Marcos Juárez, Marcos Juárez 2580, Córdoba, Argentina.
Fernando MañasFacultad de Agronomía y Veterinaria. Cátedra de Farmacología, Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto, Río Cuarto, Córdoba, 5800, Argentina.
Fernando A BessoneInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Marcos Juárez, Marcos Juárez 2580, Córdoba, Argentina.
Alejandra de Moreno de LeBlancCentro de Referencia para Lactobacilos (CERELA), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán, 4000, Argentina.
Fabrisio E AlustizaInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Marcos Juárez, Marcos Juárez 2580, Córdoba, Argentina.
Romina V BellingeriFacultad de Agronomía y Veterinaria, Departamento de Anatomía Animal, Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto, Río Cuarto, Córdoba, 5800, Argentina.
Laura Noelia CariddiFacultad de Ciencias Exactas Físico-Químicas y Naturales, Departamento de Microbiología e Inmunología, Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto, Río Cuarto, Córdoba, 5800, Argentina. lcariddi@exa.unrc.edu.ar.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3047-6419

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early weaning is an important stressor that impairs the piglet´s health, and essential oils appear as promising candidates to improve it instead of antibiotics. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of oral supplementation of free and nanoencapsulated Minthostachys verticillata essential oil (EO and NEO, respectively) on immunological, biochemical and antioxidants parameters as well as on gut microbiota in weaned piglets. EO was extracted by hydrodistillation and nanoencapsulation was performed by high-energy method using Tween 80 and Span 60 as surfactants. EO and NEO were chemically analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The cytotoxic effects of both EO and NEO was evaluated on Caco-2 cell line. For in vivo assay, male weaned piglets (age: 28 days, mean initial body weight: 11.63 ± 0.37 kg) were randomly distributed in six groups of six animals each (n = 6) and received orally EO (10.0 mg/kg/day) or NEO (2.5, 5.0 and 10.0 mg/kg/day), named hereinafter as EO-10, NEO-2.5, NEO-5 and NEO-10, for 30 consecutive days. Animals not treated or treated with surfactants mixture were evaluated as control and vehicle control. Subsequently, histological, hematological and biochemical parameters, cytokines production, oxidative markers, CD4

Indexed as

Animal FeedAntioxidantsDietary SupplementsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeOils, VolatileAdministration, OralAnimalsCaco-2 CellsDietHumansMaleSwineWeaningAntioxidantsOils, VolatileAntibiotic replacementEssential oilsImmunostimulationNanotechnologyProduction animals

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.