ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024
Using protein geometry to optimize cytotoxicity and the cytokine window of a ROR1 specific T cell engager.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nanobody-based targeted cancer therapy and immunotherapy: fear not the future.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2026Review
- Review
- Computational Prediction of Single-Domain Immunoglobulin Aggregation Propensities Facilitates Discovery and Humanization of Recombinant Nanobodies.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A ROR1 targeted bispecific T cell engager shows high potency in the pre-clinical model of triple negative breast cancer.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025Article
- Targeting highly attenuated IL-18 to PD-1 for enhanced anti-tumor activity.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
T cell engaging bispecific antibodies have shown clinical proof of concept for hematologic malignancies. Still, cytokine release syndrome, neurotoxicity, and on-target-off-tumor toxicity, especially in the solid tumor setting, represent major obstacles. Second generation TCEs have been described that decouple cytotoxicity from cytokine release by reducing the apparent binding affinity for CD3 and/or the TAA but the results of such engineering have generally led only to reduced maximum induction of cytokine release and often at the expense of maximum cytotoxicity. Using ROR1 as our model TAA and highly modular camelid nanobodies, we describe the engineering of a next generation decoupled TCE that incorporates a "cytokine window" defined as a dose range in which maximal killing is reached but cytokine release may be modulated from very low for safety to nearly that induced by first generation TCEs. This latter attribute supports pro-inflammatory anti-tumor activity including bystander killing and can potentially be used by clinicians to safely titrate patient dose to that which mediates maximum efficacy that is postulated as greater than that possible using standard second generation approaches. We used a combined method of optimizing TCE mediated synaptic distance and apparent affinity tuning of the TAA binding arms to generate a relatively long but persistent synapse that supports a wide cytokine window, potent killing and a reduced propensity towards immune exhaustion. Importantly, this next generation TCE induced significant tumor growth inhibition
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.