Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38457204›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2024

The Acceptance and Use of Digital Technologies for Self-Reporting Medication Safety Events After Care Transitions to Home in Patients With Cancer: Survey Study.

Yun Jiang, Misun Hwang, Youmin Cho, Christopher R Friese, Sarah T Hawley, Milisa Manojlovich, John C Krauss, Yang Gong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The relationship between medication beliefs, patient activation, and self-rated health in patients taking oral anticancer agents.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yun JiangSchool of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6737-5016
Misun HwangSchool of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8102-3308
Youmin ChoSchool of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1381-652X
Christopher R FrieseSchool of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2281-2056
Sarah T HawleyRogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5756-645X
Milisa ManojlovichSchool of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6101-5535
John C KraussRogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5197-736X
Yang GongMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0864-8368

Funding

XenograftP30CA046592 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani · 1988 to 2026
$178.2M
Interdisciplinary Research Training Center in Cancer Care DeliveryT32CA236621 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Lauren P Wallner · 2020 to 2026
$2.8M
Patient Engagement in Reporting Medication Events during Transitions of CareR01HS027846 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GONG, YANG, JIANG, YUN · 2021 to 2025
$2.0M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS027846NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046592NCI NIH HHS T32 CA236621
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundActively engaging patients with cancer and their families in monitoring and reporting medication safety events during care transitions is indispensable for achieving optimal patient safety outcomes. However, existing patient self-reporting systems often cannot address patients' various experiences and concerns regarding medication safety over time. In addition, these systems are usually not designed for patients' just-in-time reporting. There is a significant knowledge gap in understanding the nature, scope, and causes of medication safety events after patients' transition back home because of a lack of patient engagement in self-monitoring and reporting of safety events. The challenges for patients with cancer in adopting digital technologies and engaging in self-reporting medication safety events during transitions of care have not been fully understood.

objectiveWe aim to assess oncology patients' perceptions of medication and communication safety during care transitions and their willingness to use digital technologies for self-reporting medication safety events and to identify factors associated with their technology acceptance.

methodsA cross-sectional survey study was conducted with adult patients with breast, prostate, lung, or colorectal cancer (N=204) who had experienced care transitions from hospitals or clinics to home in the past 1 year. Surveys were conducted via phone, the internet, or email between December 2021 and August 2022. Participants' perceptions of medication and communication safety and perceived usefulness, ease of use, attitude toward use, and intention to use a technology system to report their medication safety events from home were assessed as outcomes. Potential personal, clinical, and psychosocial factors were analyzed for their associations with participants' technology acceptance through bivariate correlation analyses and multiple logistic regressions.

resultsParticipants reported strong perceptions of medication and communication safety, positively correlated with medication self-management ability and patient activation. Although most participants perceived a medication safety self-reporting system as useful (158/204, 77.5%) and easy to use (157/204, 77%), had a positive attitude toward use (162/204, 79.4%), and were willing to use such a system (129/204, 63.2%), their technology acceptance was associated with their activation levels (odds ratio [OR] 1.83, 95% CI 1.12-2.98), their perceptions of communication safety (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.08-2.47), and whether they could receive feedback after self-reporting (OR 3.27, 95% CI 1.37-7.78).

conclusionsIn general, oncology patients were willing to use digital technologies to report their medication events after care transitions back home because of their high concerns regarding medication safety. As informed and activated patients are more likely to have the knowledge and capability to initiate and engage in self-reporting, developing a patient-centered reporting system to empower patients and their families and facilitate safety health communications will help oncology patients in addressing their medication safety concerns, meeting their care needs, and holding promise to improve the quality of cancer care.

Indexed as

Digital TechnologyNeoplasmsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMalePatient TransferSurveys and Questionnairesdigital technologydrug-related side effects and adverse reactionspatient participationpatient-reported outcomespatient safety

Identifiers

PMID38457204
PMCPMC10960221

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.