Evidence mapPaperPMID 38457236Full record

SynthesisCancer medicine2024

Prescribing pre- and post-operative physical activity interventions for people undergoing breast cancer surgery: A qualitative systematic review.

Lauren Howe, Andy Husband, Anna Robinson-Barella

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06593639 (Does Prehabilitation be Able to Favorably Impact on the Pathway of Head and Neck Cancer Patients, Candidate to Surgery or Chemoradiotherapy as Primary Treatment? A Prospective Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06593639 narecruitingnot on this map

Does Prehabilitation be Able to Favorably Impact on the Pathway of Head and Neck Cancer Patients, Candidate to Surgery or Chemoradiotherapy as Primary Treatment? A Prospective Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorLaura Deborah LocatiRan2024 to 2026Enrolled60ConditionsHead and Neck CancerArmsPrehabilitation before surgery, Prehabilitation before and during CRT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lauren HoweSchool of Pharmacy, King George VI Building, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Andy HusbandSchool of Pharmacy, King George VI Building, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Anna Robinson-BarellaSchool of Pharmacy, King George VI Building, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9523-4760
Newcastle University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUndertaking physical activity, pre- and post-operatively, can benefit recovery time and improve post-surgical outcomes. One cohort of patients that have reported these benefits are those undergoing surgery for breast cancer. Yet, what remains unclear is the level to which physical activity interventions are implemented into standard surgical care for patients with breast cancer.

aimsThis systematic review aimed to examine existing qualitative evidence focusing on pre- and post-operative physical activity interventions to better understand the benefits and shortcomings of physical activity within the surgical journey.

methodsA systematic literature search was undertaken in November 2022, across five databases: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, CINAHL, and Scopus. Qualitative studies involving people with breast cancer who had undertaken a physical activity intervention, either pre- and/or post-operatively, were included for analysis. The review was registered on PROSPERO: CRD42022372466 and performed according to PRISMA guidelines. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme qualitative study checklist was used to assess study quality.

resultsFourteen studies were included, comprising the perspectives of 418 people receiving surgery for breast cancer. One study implemented preoperative physical activity interventions; the remaining studies focused on post-operative interventions. A narrative systematic review was undertaken due to heterogeneity in reported results. Four themes were developed by thematic analysis, centring on: (1) factors promoting engagement with physical activity interventions; (2) factors preventing engagement with physical activity interventions; (3) the impact of pre- and post-operative interventions on physical and psychological health; and (4) participant recommendations for pre- and post-operative interventions.

conclusionPre- and post-operative physical activity interventions were well-accepted. Patients recognised factors which promoted or prevented engagement with interventions, as well as pre- and post-operative physical and psychological benefits that arose as a result. Evidence based co-design studies may further inform successful implementation of prescribed physical activity into standard care for surgical breast cancer patients.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsExerciseFemaleHumansMental HealthPostoperative CarePreoperative Carebreast cancerphysical activityqualitative evidence synthesissurgerysystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38457236
PMCPMC10923032
OpenAlexW4392605394

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.